Add Your Idea

Allow “previous history” to be fully taken into consideration when sentencing

Comment 10th July 2010

At present, when a judge decides a sentence for an offender, only previous *related* offences are taken into consideration.

Thus, for instance, if the current crime being judged is for car theft, a previous history of convictions for shoplifting or housebreaking or assault is not taken into consideration because these are not considered relevant to car theft.

A single person can become an entire crime wave, yet still get off with nothing more than a trivial punishment for each crime, as long as they remain *unrelated* to each other.

Which seems pretty daft to me, and shows that justice in this country is aimed more at raising revenue for the government than setting the standards that people should live by.

Why does this matter?

Identify the "developing" criminals earlier, and allow something to be done about it before they get chance to develop into hardened criminals.

Reduction in both petty and serious crime.

Show the public that the justice system really does work – instead of demonstrating that it doesn't.

Get the troublemakers off the streets.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Highlighted posts


Comment on this idea

Good idea? Bad idea? Let us know your thoughts.


Back to top
Add Your Idea