Add Your Idea

Amend the HEALTH ACT 2006 in order to restore freedom from health inequalities

Comment 26th July 2010

Prior to the Health Act 2006, everyone knew where they stood – that is, ordinary persons who were not wealthy could rely upon the National Health Service to cure their health problems, if possible. Wealthy persons had access to Private Medicine and could therefore take advantage of the latest advances in medicine, even though these advances may not be effective. Part 1 of Chapter 28 of the Health Act 2006 singled out certain people who, from a Health point of view, needed to be given privileged status. . These people received special treatment from a health point of view, and therefore a health inequality was created by the Health Act 2006 in that some people  who go into a public enclosed place are especially privileged, as  compared to people who do not go into similar public places. This is wrong. The provisions of the Health Act 2006 should have included ALL the circumstances where people suffer from Health Inequalities. These people include anyone who walks down a street and is subjected to the Health inequality of car exhaust fumes, or any similar circumstance.

Why does this matter?

The Health Act 2006 created a special group of people to be protected from Health Inequalities. If the Health Act 2006 had been more general in its application, ALL Health Inequalities could have been expunged. It follows therefore that the Act needs to be amended in order to provide freedom from Health Inequalities for everyone.


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Highlighted posts


Comment on this idea

Good idea? Bad idea? Let us know your thoughts.


Back to top
Add Your Idea