Add Your Idea

Re-think the entire Legal Aid System and Save Millions ££££

Comment 5th July 2010

The entire area of legal aid should be reviewed as it's just a gravy train for lawyers and is not fit for purpose.

 

Why does this matter?

In 2007 Jack Straw said that the cost of legal aid in the UK was the highest in the world at £2.2 BILLION – up from (a mere) £138m in 1980!! Goodness only knows what the figure is now, 3 years on!!!

Clearly, something has to be done to get the costs down and one way would be to look who gets legal aid. I mean, how can it be right that the wealthy, but (allegedly) corrupt MP's who (allegedly) fiddled their expenses can mount what is likely to be a multi-million pound defence thanks to the tax payer and legal aid, when legal aid's denied to those on even moderate incomes??

But more fundamentally than that, the whole thing's a farce and needs a complete overhaul and I'd start with those lawyers who make an indecent living from regularly defending the indefensible.

At the moment there seems to be no down side to lawyers (who must know full well when their clients are as guilty as sin) from actively discouraging a “guilty” plea because this has the distinct disadvantage of resulting in a short trial and small fee. Far better to go for the “not guilty” plea and the resulting full blown “bells and whistles” show trial with the much bigger fee at the end of it!!!  

So I’d say that where someone enters a “not guilty” plea THEN ALL THE COSTS SHOULD FALL ON THE DEFENDING LAWYERS IF A “GUILTY” VERDICT IS RETURNED, the tax payer only picking up the bill where the defendant’s original plea is confirmed by a "not guilty" verdict.

This shouldn't be a problem because if the lawyers genuinely believe their client to be innocent then it would only be their own incompetence that failed to get a "not guilty" verdict – and why should the tax payer subsidise legal incompetence?

On the other hand, if the lawyers realise that there’s no chance of winning then they would be daft not to encourage their clients to enter a “guilty” plea.

So, in summary :-

PLEA                           VERDICT                                     RESULT

NOT GUILTY             NOT GUILTY                  TRIAL FUNDED BY LEGAL AID

NOT GUILTY            GUILTY               LAWYERS STAND THE COST OF THE     TRIAL – TOUGH!

GUILTY                      GUILTY                                  TRIAL FUNDED BY LEGAL AID

All the above would still be open to the usual appeals etc with the lawyers still carrying the can for clients who continually plead their innocence but who continue to be found guilty at every turn.

                               

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Highlighted posts


Comment on this idea

Good idea? Bad idea? Let us know your thoughts.


Back to top
Add Your Idea