Add Your Idea

repeal Parliamentary Oaths Act 1866

Comment 4th July 2010

I don't really think someone elected to Parliament should have to swear or affirm anything.  We as voters should chose someone we want to represent us.

Why does this matter?

I don't think I can put it any better than this:

"Various objections are levied against the oath of allegiance: objections to the religious loyalties still implicit in the oath; republican objections to the requirement to pledge allegiance to the Crown; objections that the oath contains no pledge of duty towards the people, or towards democracy. There are also objections to Members of Parliament having to take an oath at all."

 The Parliamentary Oath  RESEARCH PAPER 00/17 14 FEBRUARY 2000, House of Commons Library


Highlighted posts

Add Your Idea

Comment on this idea

Good idea? Bad idea? Let us know your thoughts.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top
Add Your Idea