Add Your Idea

Scrap the renewable energy MCS registration scheme

5 Comments 21st April 2015

The MCS registration scheme is yet another example of a multi-layered Quango.

Ofgem sub-contract the MCS scheme to Gemserve. All Gemserve seem to do is hold the database.

Gemserve sub-contract to various third party Accreditation Bodies.

The Accreditation Body insist you have your renewable energy device tested by an independant testing laboratory. The Accreditation Body will then look at the test results and charge you five grand for the privilege.

And you have to test against an outdated British Standard that was derived from a irrelavent European standard. We never achieve the levels of solar radiation specified in the European standard. In order to meet this outdated and over-the-top British Standard you are forced to design with more expensive materials.

The whole scheme is pointless as any electricity generated will be measured by a smartmeter. If the renewable energy device doesn't perform no electricity will be generated and no feed-in-tariff will be paid. There is absolutely no need for a certification scheme.

The critical problem with the renewable energy sector is cost not quality. Micro-generation is just not cost effective. The MCS scheme only serves to drive up costs making renewables less likely to be adopted.

Why does this matter?

The adoption of renewables will be critical over the next few years. The MCS scheme is a barrier to makining this happen.

Removing the MCS scheme would also allow the development of new innovative renewable technologies that will dramatically reduce the costs.


Highlighted posts


Add Your Idea

5 Responses to Scrap the renewable energy MCS registration scheme

Comment on this idea

Good idea? Bad idea? Let us know your thoughts.


Back to top
Add Your Idea