Repeal the law that requires a license for live music.

Why is this idea important?

I play in 2 amateur jazz bands, we don't play loudly nor charge much, and each jazz band used to play about 6 gigs per year  at fetes and charity dances, and other charity events. Since the law was introduced we are down to about 1 or 2 gigs a year – which is less fun for us amateur musicians, and less fun at the fetes and charity events.
To quote from the Live Music Forum's recent petition to the government in June:

"Under the Licensing Act, a performance by one musician in a bar, restaurant, school or hospital not licensed for live music could lead to a criminal prosecution of those organising the event. Even a piano may count as a licensable 'entertainment facility'. By contrast, amplified big screen broadcast entertainment is exempt. The government says the Act is necessary to control noise nuisance, crime, disorder and public safety, even though other laws already deal with those risks. Musicians warned the Act would harm small events. About 50% of bars and 75% of restaurants have no live music permission. Obtaining permission for the mildest live music remains costly and time-consuming. In May, the Culture, Media and Sport Committee recommended exemptions for venues up to 200 capacity and for unamplified performance by one or two musicians. The government said no. But those exemptions would restore some fairness in the regulation of live music and encourage grassroots venues."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *