Requiring Judges to comply with the Human Rights Act 1998

Idea:

To repeal / amend the English Law that allows Judges to: not comply with the Human Rights Act 1998; carry out judicial acts that are made unlawful under Section 6(1) of the Human rights Act 1998 and; infringe a litigant's Convention rights in Civil Cases in the Royal Courts of Justice. 

There are Decisions made by Judges in the Royal Courts of Justice that clearly rule that a litigant cannot rely on the clearly stated provisions of Section 7(1)(a) and 7(1)(b) of the Human Rights Act 1998 in terms of their judicial acts.  However, the Judges refuse to disclose which English Law they are relying on to do this.

Those Convention rights are hard won freedoms / rights that have been lost by Judge's judicial acts.  The Judges have placed themselves above the Law.

Please contact me if you require any further information / evidence.

 

Why is this idea important?

Idea:

To repeal / amend the English Law that allows Judges to: not comply with the Human Rights Act 1998; carry out judicial acts that are made unlawful under Section 6(1) of the Human rights Act 1998 and; infringe a litigant's Convention rights in Civil Cases in the Royal Courts of Justice. 

There are Decisions made by Judges in the Royal Courts of Justice that clearly rule that a litigant cannot rely on the clearly stated provisions of Section 7(1)(a) and 7(1)(b) of the Human Rights Act 1998 in terms of their judicial acts.  However, the Judges refuse to disclose which English Law they are relying on to do this.

Those Convention rights are hard won freedoms / rights that have been lost by Judge's judicial acts.  The Judges have placed themselves above the Law.

Please contact me if you require any further information / evidence.