Repeal blasphemy laws

Unlike many proposals this is pure principal. There are almost no prosecutions or pratical problems caused by these predujical relics. But why should Christians be able to have thier nutty ideas rendered unassailable when all the other nutters have to put up with it. (Ooops am I guilty already? of blasphemy not poor spelling!)

Why is this idea important?

Unlike many proposals this is pure principal. There are almost no prosecutions or pratical problems caused by these predujical relics. But why should Christians be able to have thier nutty ideas rendered unassailable when all the other nutters have to put up with it. (Ooops am I guilty already? of blasphemy not poor spelling!)

Educational quangos; repeal regulation and close IFL

The Institute for Learning is an intrusive and ineffective body. The idear that standards in further educatuion should be raised is fine but this body is failing to achieve anything. By removing the regulation that all teachers in further education must be registered the body will wither and die. No one, heads students and the vast majoority of teachers have a good word to say for the organisation. They themselves publish achievments the best of which has been that teaches feel their self esteem has been raised. Stop this nonsence and remove the restrictive legislation.

Why is this idea important?

The Institute for Learning is an intrusive and ineffective body. The idear that standards in further educatuion should be raised is fine but this body is failing to achieve anything. By removing the regulation that all teachers in further education must be registered the body will wither and die. No one, heads students and the vast majoority of teachers have a good word to say for the organisation. They themselves publish achievments the best of which has been that teaches feel their self esteem has been raised. Stop this nonsence and remove the restrictive legislation.