Uphold the European supreme court findings on Sex “offender” notifications etc.

The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that lifelong requirements for sex offenders to notify the police when they move house or travel abroad are a breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The result of the judgment is that the Supreme Court have issued a “declaration of incompatibility” with the Human Rights Act 1998.

The requirements were a disproportionate manner of pursuing a legitimate aim of preventing crime and therefore breached their rights under Article 8.

Lord Philips gave the leading judgment. He emphasised that the question (as in the case of all human rights claims involving a “qualified” right in general and Article 8 in particular) was one of proportionality, and that the correct test, as had been set out in previous decisions, was:

whether: (i) the legislative objective is sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right; (ii) the measures designed to meet the legislative objective are rationally connected to it; and (iii) the means used to impair the right or freedom are no more than is necessary to accomplish the objective (para 17)

Why is this idea important?

The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that lifelong requirements for sex offenders to notify the police when they move house or travel abroad are a breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The result of the judgment is that the Supreme Court have issued a “declaration of incompatibility” with the Human Rights Act 1998.

The requirements were a disproportionate manner of pursuing a legitimate aim of preventing crime and therefore breached their rights under Article 8.

Lord Philips gave the leading judgment. He emphasised that the question (as in the case of all human rights claims involving a “qualified” right in general and Article 8 in particular) was one of proportionality, and that the correct test, as had been set out in previous decisions, was:

whether: (i) the legislative objective is sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right; (ii) the measures designed to meet the legislative objective are rationally connected to it; and (iii) the means used to impair the right or freedom are no more than is necessary to accomplish the objective (para 17)

“A Big Society”, and “Live and let Live”? and “a more tolerant society” ?

Damian Green spoke on Question time (22.07.10) of “A Big Society”, and “Live and let Live”? and “a more tolerant society” ?
Why therefore demonise reformed sex “offenders” ?

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called Public “protection” officers such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform Brain surgery. The police and especially public “protection" have proven a scant regard for the "offender" and their family / friends. They have entirely abused their positions, drastically harmed all concerned. The so called public “protection" officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrists or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.

The 2003 Sex "offender" Act / laws should be scrapped entirely.

Why is this idea important?

Damian Green spoke on Question time (22.07.10) of “A Big Society”, and “Live and let Live”? and “a more tolerant society” ?
Why therefore demonise reformed sex “offenders” ?

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called Public “protection” officers such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform Brain surgery. The police and especially public “protection" have proven a scant regard for the "offender" and their family / friends. They have entirely abused their positions, drastically harmed all concerned. The so called public “protection" officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrists or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.

The 2003 Sex "offender" Act / laws should be scrapped entirely.

“A Big Society”, and “a more tolerant society” ? Why therefore ….

Damian Green spoke on Question time (22.07.10) of “A Big Society”, and “Live and let Live”? and “a more tolerant society” ?
Why therefore demonise reformed sex “offenders” ?

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called Public “protection” officers such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform Brain surgery. The police and especially public “protection” have proven a scant regard for the “offender” and their family / friends. They have entirely abused their positions, drastically harmed all concerned. The so called public “protection” officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrists or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.

The 2003 Sex “offender” Act / laws should be scrapped entirely.

Why is this idea important?

Damian Green spoke on Question time (22.07.10) of “A Big Society”, and “Live and let Live”? and “a more tolerant society” ?
Why therefore demonise reformed sex “offenders” ?

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called Public “protection” officers such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform Brain surgery. The police and especially public “protection” have proven a scant regard for the “offender” and their family / friends. They have entirely abused their positions, drastically harmed all concerned. The so called public “protection” officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrists or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.

The 2003 Sex “offender” Act / laws should be scrapped entirely.

Appeal the human rights ABUSE of the 2003 sex “offender” laws.

The 2003 so called sex “offender” act is against human rights and the civil and legal rights of a European citizen.

1. It permits unprecedented powers to police forces that abuse these powers constantly.
2. it is far from transparent in anyway to the “offender” or their family.
3. The “powers” are limitless and enable police forces the alter and extend their authority.
4. It alienates the person accused of a “sexual offence” from society that creates isolation.
5. This act strips away the very civil rights of those accused and sentenced to a “sex offence” and their friends and family.
6. The so called “Public protection” offices are incapable professionally to engage with any person with mental health issues etc, they often act as suspicious detectives, further damaging the suspects, accused and family / friends health.
7. These powers prevent a healthy and normal reintegration back into society of “offenders” and prevent normal social contact and relationships from flourishing.

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called “Public protection officers” such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform brain surgery. The police and especially “public protection” have proven a scant regard for the “offender” and their family / friend. They have entirely abused their positions drastically harmed all concerned. The so called “public protection” officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrist or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.
The 2003 Sex “offender” laws are a travesty in justice and travesty in human rights !

Why is this idea important?

The 2003 so called sex “offender” act is against human rights and the civil and legal rights of a European citizen.

1. It permits unprecedented powers to police forces that abuse these powers constantly.
2. it is far from transparent in anyway to the “offender” or their family.
3. The “powers” are limitless and enable police forces the alter and extend their authority.
4. It alienates the person accused of a “sexual offence” from society that creates isolation.
5. This act strips away the very civil rights of those accused and sentenced to a “sex offence” and their friends and family.
6. The so called “Public protection” offices are incapable professionally to engage with any person with mental health issues etc, they often act as suspicious detectives, further damaging the suspects, accused and family / friends health.
7. These powers prevent a healthy and normal reintegration back into society of “offenders” and prevent normal social contact and relationships from flourishing.

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called “Public protection officers” such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform brain surgery. The police and especially “public protection” have proven a scant regard for the “offender” and their family / friend. They have entirely abused their positions drastically harmed all concerned. The so called “public protection” officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrist or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.
The 2003 Sex “offender” laws are a travesty in justice and travesty in human rights !

Stop censorship and appeal the 2003 sex “offender” act !

The 2003 Sex “offender” Act / laws should be scrapped entirely.

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called “Public protection officers” such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform brain surgery. The police and especially “public protection” have proven a scant regard for the “offender” and their family / friend. They have entirely abused their positions drastically harmed all concerned. The so called “public protection” officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrist or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.
The 2003 Sex “offender” laws are a travesty in justice and travesty in human rights !

Why is this idea important?

The 2003 Sex “offender” Act / laws should be scrapped entirely.

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called “Public protection officers” such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform brain surgery. The police and especially “public protection” have proven a scant regard for the “offender” and their family / friend. They have entirely abused their positions drastically harmed all concerned. The so called “public protection” officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrist or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.
The 2003 Sex “offender” laws are a travesty in justice and travesty in human rights !

Appeal the 2003 sex “offender” act / law !

1. It permits unprecedented powers to police forces that abuse these powers constantly.
2. it is far from transparent in anyway to the “offender” or their family.
3. The “powers” are limitless and enable police forces the alter and extend their authority.
4. It alienates the person accused of a “sexual offence” from society that creates isolation.
5. This act strips away the very civil rights of those accused and sentenced to a “sex offence” and their friends and family.
6. The so called “Public protection” offices are incapable professionally to engage with any person with mental health issues etc, they often act as suspicious detectives, further damaging the suspects, accused and family / friends health.
7. These powers prevent a healthy and normal reintegration back into society of “offenders” and prevent normal social contact and relationships from flourishing.

, if they are fortunate to still have such lyaly standing by them, and not harrassed and chased off by the police authorities etc.

Why is this idea important?

1. It permits unprecedented powers to police forces that abuse these powers constantly.
2. it is far from transparent in anyway to the “offender” or their family.
3. The “powers” are limitless and enable police forces the alter and extend their authority.
4. It alienates the person accused of a “sexual offence” from society that creates isolation.
5. This act strips away the very civil rights of those accused and sentenced to a “sex offence” and their friends and family.
6. The so called “Public protection” offices are incapable professionally to engage with any person with mental health issues etc, they often act as suspicious detectives, further damaging the suspects, accused and family / friends health.
7. These powers prevent a healthy and normal reintegration back into society of “offenders” and prevent normal social contact and relationships from flourishing.

, if they are fortunate to still have such lyaly standing by them, and not harrassed and chased off by the police authorities etc.

Appeal the terrible abusive 2003 sex “Offender” Laws/act.

Appeal the 2003 sex “offender” laws / acts it is brutally incorrect and erred, constitutionally wrong, and totally against human rights.

1. It permits unprecedented powers to police forces that abuse these powers constantly.
2. it is far from transparent in anyway to the “offender” or their family.
3. The “powers” are limitless and enable police forces the alter and extend their authority.
4. It alienates the person accused of a “sexual offence” from society that creates isolation.
5. This act strips away the very civil rights of those accused and sentenced to a “sex offence” and their friends and family.
6. The so called “Public protection” offices are incapable professionally to engage with any person with mental health issues etc, they often act as suspicious detectives, further damaging the suspects, accused and family / friends health.
7. These powers prevent a healthy and normal reintegration back into society of “offenders” and prevent normal social contact and relationships from flourishing.

Why is this idea important?

Appeal the 2003 sex “offender” laws / acts it is brutally incorrect and erred, constitutionally wrong, and totally against human rights.

1. It permits unprecedented powers to police forces that abuse these powers constantly.
2. it is far from transparent in anyway to the “offender” or their family.
3. The “powers” are limitless and enable police forces the alter and extend their authority.
4. It alienates the person accused of a “sexual offence” from society that creates isolation.
5. This act strips away the very civil rights of those accused and sentenced to a “sex offence” and their friends and family.
6. The so called “Public protection” offices are incapable professionally to engage with any person with mental health issues etc, they often act as suspicious detectives, further damaging the suspects, accused and family / friends health.
7. These powers prevent a healthy and normal reintegration back into society of “offenders” and prevent normal social contact and relationships from flourishing.

Abandon the 2003 sex “offender” act as against civil and human rights !

The 2003 sex “offender” act is against human and civil rights and should be abandoned.

1. It permits unprecedented powers to police forces that abuse these powers constantly.
2. it is far from transparent in anyway to the “offender” or their family.
3. The “powers” are limitless and enable police forces the alter and extend their authority.
4. It alienates the person accused of a “sexual offence” from society that creates isolation.
5. This act strips away the very civil rights of those accused and sentenced to a “sex offence” and their friends and family.
6. The so called “Public protection” offices are incapable professionally to engage with any person with mental health issues etc, they often act as suspicious detectives, further damaging the suspects, accused and family / friends health.
7. These powers prevent a healthy and normal reintegration back into society of “offenders” and prevent normal social contact and relationships from flourishing.

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called “Public protection officers” such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform brain surgery. The police and especially “public protection” have proven a scant regard for the “offender” and their family / friend. They have entirely abused their positions drastically harmed all concerned. The so called “public protection” officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrist or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.
The 2003 Sex “offender” laws are a travesty in justice and travesty in human rights !

Why is this idea important?

The 2003 sex “offender” act is against human and civil rights and should be abandoned.

1. It permits unprecedented powers to police forces that abuse these powers constantly.
2. it is far from transparent in anyway to the “offender” or their family.
3. The “powers” are limitless and enable police forces the alter and extend their authority.
4. It alienates the person accused of a “sexual offence” from society that creates isolation.
5. This act strips away the very civil rights of those accused and sentenced to a “sex offence” and their friends and family.
6. The so called “Public protection” offices are incapable professionally to engage with any person with mental health issues etc, they often act as suspicious detectives, further damaging the suspects, accused and family / friends health.
7. These powers prevent a healthy and normal reintegration back into society of “offenders” and prevent normal social contact and relationships from flourishing.

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called “Public protection officers” such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform brain surgery. The police and especially “public protection” have proven a scant regard for the “offender” and their family / friend. They have entirely abused their positions drastically harmed all concerned. The so called “public protection” officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrist or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.
The 2003 Sex “offender” laws are a travesty in justice and travesty in human rights !

The 2003 Sex “offender” act a travesty in justice.

The 2003 “sex offender” act / laws have stripped away the person suspected of a so called “sex offence” of his / her basic human and social rights.

1. It permits unprecedented powers to police forces that abuse these powers constantly.
2. it is far from transparent in anyway to the “offender” or their family.
3. The “powers” are limitless and enable police forces the alter and extend their authority.
4. It alienates the person accused of a “sexual offence” from society that creates isolation.
5. This act strips away the very civil rights of those accused and sentenced to a “sex offence” and their friends and family.
6. The so called “Public protection” offices are incapable professionally to engage with any person with mental health issues etc, they often act as suspicious detectives, further damaging the suspects, accused and family / friends health.
7. These powers prevent a healthy and normal reintegration back into society of “offenders” and prevent normal social contact and relationships from flourishing.

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called “Public protection officers” such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform brain surgery. The police and especially “public protection” have proven a scant regard for the “offender” and their family / friend. They have entirely abused their positions drastically harmed all concerned. The so called “public protection” officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrist or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.

Why is this idea important?

The 2003 “sex offender” act / laws have stripped away the person suspected of a so called “sex offence” of his / her basic human and social rights.

1. It permits unprecedented powers to police forces that abuse these powers constantly.
2. it is far from transparent in anyway to the “offender” or their family.
3. The “powers” are limitless and enable police forces the alter and extend their authority.
4. It alienates the person accused of a “sexual offence” from society that creates isolation.
5. This act strips away the very civil rights of those accused and sentenced to a “sex offence” and their friends and family.
6. The so called “Public protection” offices are incapable professionally to engage with any person with mental health issues etc, they often act as suspicious detectives, further damaging the suspects, accused and family / friends health.
7. These powers prevent a healthy and normal reintegration back into society of “offenders” and prevent normal social contact and relationships from flourishing.

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called “Public protection officers” such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform brain surgery. The police and especially “public protection” have proven a scant regard for the “offender” and their family / friend. They have entirely abused their positions drastically harmed all concerned. The so called “public protection” officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrist or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.

By Appealing the 2003 sex offender act.

The 2003 Sex “offender” laws are a travesty in justice and travesty in human rights !

The 2003 “sex offender” act / laws have stripped away the person suspected of a so called “sex offence” of his / her basic human and social rights.

1. It permits unprecedented powers to police forces that abuse these powers constantly.
2. it is far from transparent in anyway to the “offender” or their family.
3. The “powers” are limitless and enable police forces the alter and extend their authority.
4. It alienates the person accused of a “sexual offence” from society that creates isolation.
5. This act strips away the very civil rights of those accused and sentenced to a “sex offence” and their friends and family.
6. The so called “Public protection” offices are incapable professionally to engage with any person with mental health issues etc, they often act as suspicious detectives, further damaging the suspects, accused and family / friends health.
7. These powers prevent a healthy and normal reintegration back into society of “offenders” and prevent normal social contact and relationships from flourishing.

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called “Public protection officers” such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform brain surgery. The police and especially “public protection” have proven a scant regard for the “offender” and their family / friend.
They have entirely abused their positions drastically harmed all concerned. The so called “public protection” officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrist or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.

Why is this idea important?

The 2003 Sex “offender” laws are a travesty in justice and travesty in human rights !

The 2003 “sex offender” act / laws have stripped away the person suspected of a so called “sex offence” of his / her basic human and social rights.

1. It permits unprecedented powers to police forces that abuse these powers constantly.
2. it is far from transparent in anyway to the “offender” or their family.
3. The “powers” are limitless and enable police forces the alter and extend their authority.
4. It alienates the person accused of a “sexual offence” from society that creates isolation.
5. This act strips away the very civil rights of those accused and sentenced to a “sex offence” and their friends and family.
6. The so called “Public protection” offices are incapable professionally to engage with any person with mental health issues etc, they often act as suspicious detectives, further damaging the suspects, accused and family / friends health.
7. These powers prevent a healthy and normal reintegration back into society of “offenders” and prevent normal social contact and relationships from flourishing.

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called “Public protection officers” such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform brain surgery. The police and especially “public protection” have proven a scant regard for the “offender” and their family / friend.
They have entirely abused their positions drastically harmed all concerned. The so called “public protection” officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrist or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.

Appeal the 2003 sex “offender” act / law!

The 2003 “sex offender” act / laws have stripped away the person suspected of a so called “sex offence” of his / her basic human and social rights.

1. It permits unprecedented powers to police forces that abuse these powers constantly.
2. it is far from transparent in anyway to the “offender” or their family.
3. The “powers” are limitless and enable police forces the alter and extend their authority.
4. It alienates the person accused of a “sexual offence” from society that creates isolation.
5. This act strips away the very civil rights of those accused and sentenced to a “sex offence” and their friends and family.
6. The so called “Public protection” offices are incapable professionally to engage with any person with mental health issues etc, they often act as suspicious detectives, further damaging the suspects, accused and family / friends health.
7. These powers prevent a healthy and normal reintegration back into society of “offenders” and prevent normal social contact and relationships from flourishing.

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called “Public protection officers” such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform brain surgery. The police and especially “public protection” have proven a scant regard for the “offender” and their family / friend. They have entirely abused their positions drastically harmed all concerned. The so called “public protection” officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrist or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.
The 2003 Sex “offender” laws are a travesty in justice and travesty in human rights !

Why is this idea important?

The 2003 “sex offender” act / laws have stripped away the person suspected of a so called “sex offence” of his / her basic human and social rights.

1. It permits unprecedented powers to police forces that abuse these powers constantly.
2. it is far from transparent in anyway to the “offender” or their family.
3. The “powers” are limitless and enable police forces the alter and extend their authority.
4. It alienates the person accused of a “sexual offence” from society that creates isolation.
5. This act strips away the very civil rights of those accused and sentenced to a “sex offence” and their friends and family.
6. The so called “Public protection” offices are incapable professionally to engage with any person with mental health issues etc, they often act as suspicious detectives, further damaging the suspects, accused and family / friends health.
7. These powers prevent a healthy and normal reintegration back into society of “offenders” and prevent normal social contact and relationships from flourishing.

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called “Public protection officers” such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform brain surgery. The police and especially “public protection” have proven a scant regard for the “offender” and their family / friend. They have entirely abused their positions drastically harmed all concerned. The so called “public protection” officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrist or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.
The 2003 Sex “offender” laws are a travesty in justice and travesty in human rights !

Appeal the 2003 “sex offender” Act / laws

The 2003 "sex offender" act / laws have stripped away the person suspected of a so called "sex offence" of his / her basic human and social rights.

 

  1. It permits unprecedented powers to police forces that abuse these powers constantly.
  2. it is far from transparent in anyway to the "offender" or their family.
  3. The "powers" are limitless and enable police forces the alter and extend their authority.
  4. It alienates the person accused of a "sexual offence" from society that creates isolation.
  5. This act strips away the very civil rights of those accused and sentenced to a "sex offence" and their friends and family.
  6. The so called "Public protection" offices are incapable professionally to engage with any person with mental health issues etc, they often act as suspicious detectives, further damaging the suspects, accused and family / friends health.
  7. These powers prevent a healthy and normal reintegration back into society of "offenders" and prevent normal social contact and relationships from flourishing.

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called "Public protection officers" such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform brain surgery. The police and especially "public protection" have proven a scant regard for the "offender" and their family / friend. They have entirely abused their positions drastically harmed all concerned. The so called "public protection" officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrist or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.
The 2003 Sex “offender” laws are a travesty in justice and travesty in human rights !

 

Why is this idea important?

The 2003 "sex offender" act / laws have stripped away the person suspected of a so called "sex offence" of his / her basic human and social rights.

 

  1. It permits unprecedented powers to police forces that abuse these powers constantly.
  2. it is far from transparent in anyway to the "offender" or their family.
  3. The "powers" are limitless and enable police forces the alter and extend their authority.
  4. It alienates the person accused of a "sexual offence" from society that creates isolation.
  5. This act strips away the very civil rights of those accused and sentenced to a "sex offence" and their friends and family.
  6. The so called "Public protection" offices are incapable professionally to engage with any person with mental health issues etc, they often act as suspicious detectives, further damaging the suspects, accused and family / friends health.
  7. These powers prevent a healthy and normal reintegration back into society of "offenders" and prevent normal social contact and relationships from flourishing.

Giving the police the extensive powers under the 2003 sex offender act and especially the so called "Public protection officers" such powers is like giving a Butcher the license to perform brain surgery. The police and especially "public protection" have proven a scant regard for the "offender" and their family / friend. They have entirely abused their positions drastically harmed all concerned. The so called "public protection" officers are certainly NOT social workers, physiatrist or mental health professionals etc and only capable of being just that, Police.
The 2003 Sex “offender” laws are a travesty in justice and travesty in human rights !