Party Wall etc. Act 1996

This should be repealed because, quite apart from the unecesserily complicated phrasing of the act, no law should have "etc." in it's title.

Laws are ment to be specific for a reason. The use of "etc." completely contradicts this. It is also a complicated and confusing law that makes it hard to actually use in a court of law.

Why is this idea important?

This should be repealed because, quite apart from the unecesserily complicated phrasing of the act, no law should have "etc." in it's title.

Laws are ment to be specific for a reason. The use of "etc." completely contradicts this. It is also a complicated and confusing law that makes it hard to actually use in a court of law.