Most sensible people are in favour of measures that promote the safety and security of children and vulnerable adults. However, vetting legislation has gone too far and it is making a mockery of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (ROA).

The ROA was a piece of progressive legislation, designed to give a second chance to individuals who had committed minor offences which, in time, could become ‘spent’. This meant that the slate would be wiped clean and that, with a few exceptions, an ex-offender was free to secure employment without too many problems. Serious offences can never become spent.

Unfortunately, over time, so much vetting and barring legislation has been passed to make the ROA almost meaningless. CRB checks have been in place for a long time, but they used to be restricted to people working in direct contact with children or vulnerable adults: e.g. teachers and social workers. Now, CRB checks are the norm for practically all NHS and education positions (from cooks to cleaners, from admin assistants to electricians) and for many other public sector jobs. All CRB checks in England contain information about spent convictions. This means that people in their forties with decade old spent convictions have problems with employment.

 In addition to spent convictions, there are other major issues:

  1.  With enhanced CRB checks, all sorts of incidents and allegations that did not result in prosecution or conviction can be made available to an employer.
  2.  Some employers ask for CRB checks for roles that do not require them, effectively using the vetting system as a form of recruitment selection.
  3.  The CRB is aware that some employers abuse the system but turn a blind eye to it.

It’s easy to see the need to ensure that anyone who has been convicted of a sexual assault may be unsuitable for work with children or vulnerable adults, and that such a crime should continue to show up permanently on CRB checks. What causes concern is that people with old  and spent convictions for offences which did not involve harm to children or vulnerable adults, should be in a position years later, where what they did when they were young still comes back to cause problems.

Spent convictions should really be spent and employers should not have access to them. In fact, they should be wiped from the Police National Computer database.

Why is this idea important?

My idea is important because as a liberal and progressive society, we must be able to distinguish between serious criminals and minor offenders.

Home Office statistics show that one in three men have at least one criminal conviction for a non-motoring offence by the time they are 30. Only a small minority of them have committed a serious crime.

2 Replies to “CRB checks and the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act (1974)”

  1. I’ve worked for 40 years without any problems relation to spent convictions but am now looking for new employment after 22 years with my current employer.The post for which I will apply should not even be relevant to CRB checking, but as you say its become a blanket vetting sytem and is revealing offences previously covered by the ROA 1974 to people who should not know about them.
    Your suggestion of removing such spent offences from the PNC seems the only cost effective and right minded solution.
    The police will not countenence this of course, given that they are busily building up a DNA data base of every one arrested, contrary to European law.

    1. I am forty this year and have 2 drunk disorderly fines from when i was 25. I am now a teacher and must deal with applying for jobs and disclosing my embarassing past at interview. I am working abroad as I did not get a job in the UK (no CRB check required here!) however I am returning to uk.
      In the past I had to write a letter to the school explaining my disclosure and this was brought up in the interview.

      I am now looking for work out of teaching as I believe I dont have a chance of getting a job. Supply agencies have confirmed that placing me would be difficult!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *