Obstrctions should not be put in-front of decent folk.

When a private landlord issues a ‘Notice to Quit (NTQ)’ or ‘Section 21 (SEC21)’ form to enable him or her to legally take-back his property from the current tenant this process takes many months in itself.

It does not help that the legal system and local councils, Merton Council to name one for your reference, getting negatively involved advising the bad tenant to remain in the property, illegally remaining after the expiry date of the NTQ or SEC21.

Issuing of the NTQ or SEC21 should be it. Any other legal responsibility should be on the shoulders of the tenant(s) and not the landlord who has already given many months notice!

I am not advocating any shortcutting of eviction processes that are currently in place to protect good tenants because this would be unethical of me to suggest this. The protection of tenants should be balanced with the interests of the local community at heart too. Keeping ASBOs in-place because the local (Merton) council do not wish not want to rehouse them is not the problem of the local community nor the private landlord.

Furthermore, if any ‘legal Aid’ is offered to any defendant then the same legal aid need to be offered to the Plaintiff. This would focus the minds of those faceless individuals who give many thousands of faceless lawyers and judges who a re financially benefiting from the good-will gesture of the local pay clerks. This individual matter applies to all legal cases!
 

When a private landlord issues a ‘Notice to Quit (NTQ)’ or ‘Section 21 (SEC21)’ form to enable him or her to legally take-back his property from the current tenant this process takes many months in itself.

 

It does not help that the legal system and local councils, Merton Council to name one for your reference, getting negatively involved advising the bad tenant to remain in the property, illegally remaining after the expiry date of the NTQ or SEC21.

 

Issuing of the NTQ or SEC21 should be it. Any other legal responsibility should be on the shoulders of the tenant(s) and not the landlord who has already given many months notice!

 

I am not advocating any shortcutting of eviction processes that are currently in place  to protect good tenants because this would be unethical of me to suggest this. The protection of tenants should be balanced with the interests of the local community at heart too. Keeping ASBOs in-place because the local (Merton) council do not wish not want to rehouse them is not the problem of the local community nor the private landlord.

 

Furthermore, if any ‘legal Aid’ is offered to any defendant then the same legal aid need to be offered to the Plaintiff. This would focus the minds of those faceless individuals who give many thousands of faceless lawyers and judges who a re financially benefiting from the good-will gesture of the local pay clerks. This individual matter applies to all legal cases!

When a private landlord issues a ‘Notice to Quit (NTQ)’ or ‘Section 21 (SEC21)’ form to enable him or her to legally take-back his property from the current tenant this process takes many months in itself.

 

It does not help that the legal system and local councils, Merton Council to name one for your reference, getting negatively involved advising the bad tenant to remain in the property, illegally remaining after the expiry date of the NTQ or SEC21.

 

Issuing of the NTQ or SEC21 should be it. Any other legal responsibility should be on the shoulders of the tenant(s) and not the landlord who has already given many months notice!

 

I am not advocating any shortcutting of eviction processes that are currently in place  to protect good tenants because this would be unethical of me to suggest this. The protection of tenants should be balanced with the interests of the local community at heart too. Keeping ASBOs in-place because the local (Merton) council do not wish not want to rehouse them is not the problem of the local community nor the private landlord.

 

Furthermore, if any ‘legal Aid’ is offered to any defendant then the same legal aid need to be offered to the Plaintiff. This would focus the minds of those faceless individuals who give many thousands of faceless lawyers and judges who a re financially benefiting from the good-will gesture of the local pay clerks. This individual matter applies to all legal cases!

Why is this idea important?

Paying Criminals to be supported for their irresponsible behviour is totally unacceptable!

The Legal System should support the Victims not the Criminals!

Legal aid being balanced between the criminal and victim should reduce legal aid!!!

STOP SUPPORTING CRIMINALS!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.