Ban abortion.

The Abortion Act of 1967 which legalised abortion is in violation of article two of the 1998 Human Rights Act namely the Right To Life and so I feel we should illegalise abortion (though if it is a case of killing the mother and baby or just the baby this should be allowed so we can save as many lives as we can) and so either ban abortion or amend the Human Rights Act to remove article two.

Why is this idea important?

The Abortion Act of 1967 which legalised abortion is in violation of article two of the 1998 Human Rights Act namely the Right To Life and so I feel we should illegalise abortion (though if it is a case of killing the mother and baby or just the baby this should be allowed so we can save as many lives as we can) and so either ban abortion or amend the Human Rights Act to remove article two.

Stop the Abortion Inequality in the UK

Abortion continues to be illegal in Northern Ireland, despite being a part of the UK. This leads to unnecessary trauma to women (not to mention expense) forced to travel to the mainland for abortions. It's a disgrace that the UK Government is quite happy to restrict the rights of women in this part of the UK. 

Why is this idea important?

Abortion continues to be illegal in Northern Ireland, despite being a part of the UK. This leads to unnecessary trauma to women (not to mention expense) forced to travel to the mainland for abortions. It's a disgrace that the UK Government is quite happy to restrict the rights of women in this part of the UK. 

Set a point when a foetus becomes considered life. Keep Abbortions.

I recently posted a similar article to this upon which many people got the wrong idea and were thinking i wanted abbortions banned due to the articles title. This is not the case i completely agree with abbortions so please remember that when rating this article. i merely feel that at some point while in the womb a baby should be considered life. 

Thankyou

My suggestion is to define a point while a baby is in its mothers womb at which the baby in law becomes considered to be a "Human Being".

Under the current law a baby is not considered to be a human being until it is independent of its mother meaning it has left her womb. This means that if a mother naturally goes into labour after 9 months and she was stabbed killing the baby then no offence has been committed against the baby or as law calls "the foetus". this is despite the fact that had the baby been born that day it would have survived without complications.

I am no medical or legal expert I am merely a 17 year old student, but I personally think its disgusting that parents can have their child's life taken from them and there is no offence on the baby, I call it Murder. I ask anyone reading this who currently has a pregnancy in the family or close to the family, how does it make you feel that if someone where to harm the pregnant women therefore killing the baby, even if those actions where clearly intentional, no offence exists? its actually impossible to legally Murder a child while its in its mothers womb. And to any parent who is reading this, you should be angered at the thought that had your child been killed the day before their birth then apparently they have not been murdered. Children can be deprived of life without the law being broken. 

 

 

Why is this idea important?

I recently posted a similar article to this upon which many people got the wrong idea and were thinking i wanted abbortions banned due to the articles title. This is not the case i completely agree with abbortions so please remember that when rating this article. i merely feel that at some point while in the womb a baby should be considered life. 

Thankyou

My suggestion is to define a point while a baby is in its mothers womb at which the baby in law becomes considered to be a "Human Being".

Under the current law a baby is not considered to be a human being until it is independent of its mother meaning it has left her womb. This means that if a mother naturally goes into labour after 9 months and she was stabbed killing the baby then no offence has been committed against the baby or as law calls "the foetus". this is despite the fact that had the baby been born that day it would have survived without complications.

I am no medical or legal expert I am merely a 17 year old student, but I personally think its disgusting that parents can have their child's life taken from them and there is no offence on the baby, I call it Murder. I ask anyone reading this who currently has a pregnancy in the family or close to the family, how does it make you feel that if someone where to harm the pregnant women therefore killing the baby, even if those actions where clearly intentional, no offence exists? its actually impossible to legally Murder a child while its in its mothers womb. And to any parent who is reading this, you should be angered at the thought that had your child been killed the day before their birth then apparently they have not been murdered. Children can be deprived of life without the law being broken. 

 

 

End free social abortions on the NHS

It would be better if there were no abortions, but we live in a democracy which has voted for women to have the right to have an abortion subject to certain conditions.  In practice, however, since 1967 the country has seemed to have moved from a situation where two eminent physicians might be up all night agonising on whether an abortion was appropriate in a particular case to one where abortion seems a right available on demand.   Repeat social abortions for the same person are also increasing.  Consideration should be given to not having any social abortions freely available on the NHS.  All social abortion applications on the NHS should be means tested, while retaining free treatment only for those abortions which would meet the Amnesty criteria.

Why is this idea important?

It would be better if there were no abortions, but we live in a democracy which has voted for women to have the right to have an abortion subject to certain conditions.  In practice, however, since 1967 the country has seemed to have moved from a situation where two eminent physicians might be up all night agonising on whether an abortion was appropriate in a particular case to one where abortion seems a right available on demand.   Repeat social abortions for the same person are also increasing.  Consideration should be given to not having any social abortions freely available on the NHS.  All social abortion applications on the NHS should be means tested, while retaining free treatment only for those abortions which would meet the Amnesty criteria.

Right to Life for Unborn Children

Someone decides to have sex, they should live with the concequences. Abortion should be banned for all social economic reasons.

Life is a sacred thing, whether you believe it is from God or not, people these days think that you just pop-out of the womb on the day you are born, but it starts before that within the womb.

If people disagree with banning Abortion for social economic reasons, could they please explain why it is differnt to killing a 5 year old because they are not an Adult yet?

Abortion is just legalised mass murder, wrapped up to make everyone feel good about it.

Why is this idea important?

Someone decides to have sex, they should live with the concequences. Abortion should be banned for all social economic reasons.

Life is a sacred thing, whether you believe it is from God or not, people these days think that you just pop-out of the womb on the day you are born, but it starts before that within the womb.

If people disagree with banning Abortion for social economic reasons, could they please explain why it is differnt to killing a 5 year old because they are not an Adult yet?

Abortion is just legalised mass murder, wrapped up to make everyone feel good about it.

Removal of the requirement of 2 doctor’s signatures before having an abortion

Currently, a woman has to obtain the signatures of 2 doctors before she is permitted to have an abortion. This is suggesting that a woman cannot possibly be capable of making an informed decision on abortion. A women should be able to have an abortion with the consent of 1 doctor only.

Why is this idea important?

Currently, a woman has to obtain the signatures of 2 doctors before she is permitted to have an abortion. This is suggesting that a woman cannot possibly be capable of making an informed decision on abortion. A women should be able to have an abortion with the consent of 1 doctor only.

Review of the Abortion Act 1967

The gap between the statute and how the abortion law functions in practice is problematic.  I'd like to see the right of the woman to choose to be recognised in law, rather than the discretion of the doctor.  This may include making access to abortion easier in the first trimester, for example, or abolishing the need for a second signature and continuing to review the time limits on abortion in light of the effect of technological developments in paediatric intensive care and their effect on viability.

Why is this idea important?

The gap between the statute and how the abortion law functions in practice is problematic.  I'd like to see the right of the woman to choose to be recognised in law, rather than the discretion of the doctor.  This may include making access to abortion easier in the first trimester, for example, or abolishing the need for a second signature and continuing to review the time limits on abortion in light of the effect of technological developments in paediatric intensive care and their effect on viability.

repeal the Abortion act

We must stop killing unborn babies some 7 million have been killed so far. We are told there is a need for immigrants to fill the lack of young people in our society wrong we need to stop killing our young people before they are born. We have stopped capitol punishment for murder but allow unborn babies to suffer capitol punishment without council for the defence or a jury, our country has become barbarian one.
 

Why is this idea important?

We must stop killing unborn babies some 7 million have been killed so far. We are told there is a need for immigrants to fill the lack of young people in our society wrong we need to stop killing our young people before they are born. We have stopped capitol punishment for murder but allow unborn babies to suffer capitol punishment without council for the defence or a jury, our country has become barbarian one.
 

Abortion is an international disgrace which must come to an end.

As I am pro-life, I am also aware of certain people claim to be pro-life but, in actuality, are far from it. REAL pro-life advocates feel that the ONLY reason for ending the life of the child is in the event that it comes to the choice of the Mother's life versus that of the child's. There are those who feel that even then, the baby should come first. We MUST remember that the baby did not cause the rape, incest, or its own physical condition. Why then, should it face execution? To make matters worse, why should it have its legs and arms torn from its body while its heart is still beating– BY ITS OWN MOTHER? Most pro-choice advocates don't want you to know that. They also don't want you to know that most often than not, the unborn child FEELS its limbs being torn from its body before the murder is complete. When we have jail time for the Mothers who murder their unborn children, and jail time for the Doctors who do the murdering, and jail time for the boy friend/husband/john/stranger who knew of the murder and did nothing to prevent it, then we will ALL live in a more civilized and compassionate world.

Most pro-choice advocates who cite the unhappy future of a child born with birth defects, no Father, or to an abusive Mother on drugs, forget to ask the children of these people whether or not THEY would have chosen death for themselves. If their answer is no, then, NO ONE should have the right to decide that for them. When you put a key into your car to start it, you expect it to start so you can drive it. When you insert your penis into a vagina, or allow a penis to be inserted into your vagina, you have to expect it to produce a child. That is its MAIN function. The unborn child should pay with its life so that you can achieve an orgasm? WHY? Am I a religious fanatic? No. I am a non-believer. Am I better than everyone else or do I think I am? Far from it. I party, go clubbing, drink on occasion like a fish, drive insanely fast sometimes, have experimented with drugs, and do my share of wrongs like everyone else. When I do something wrong though, I take resonsibility for it.

Someone who is contemplating an abortion should go to an orphanage or to a children's hospital and look at how they are living. They may not be living like you and I but, they have their friends, their enemies, their favorite T.V. shows, and they find joy in their lives just as we do, because they ARE a part of us. I wonder if you would have the nerve to ask them if they would have traded their lives for your orgasm or for your quest for a perfect person? I wonder what their answer would be?

Why is this idea important?

As I am pro-life, I am also aware of certain people claim to be pro-life but, in actuality, are far from it. REAL pro-life advocates feel that the ONLY reason for ending the life of the child is in the event that it comes to the choice of the Mother's life versus that of the child's. There are those who feel that even then, the baby should come first. We MUST remember that the baby did not cause the rape, incest, or its own physical condition. Why then, should it face execution? To make matters worse, why should it have its legs and arms torn from its body while its heart is still beating– BY ITS OWN MOTHER? Most pro-choice advocates don't want you to know that. They also don't want you to know that most often than not, the unborn child FEELS its limbs being torn from its body before the murder is complete. When we have jail time for the Mothers who murder their unborn children, and jail time for the Doctors who do the murdering, and jail time for the boy friend/husband/john/stranger who knew of the murder and did nothing to prevent it, then we will ALL live in a more civilized and compassionate world.

Most pro-choice advocates who cite the unhappy future of a child born with birth defects, no Father, or to an abusive Mother on drugs, forget to ask the children of these people whether or not THEY would have chosen death for themselves. If their answer is no, then, NO ONE should have the right to decide that for them. When you put a key into your car to start it, you expect it to start so you can drive it. When you insert your penis into a vagina, or allow a penis to be inserted into your vagina, you have to expect it to produce a child. That is its MAIN function. The unborn child should pay with its life so that you can achieve an orgasm? WHY? Am I a religious fanatic? No. I am a non-believer. Am I better than everyone else or do I think I am? Far from it. I party, go clubbing, drink on occasion like a fish, drive insanely fast sometimes, have experimented with drugs, and do my share of wrongs like everyone else. When I do something wrong though, I take resonsibility for it.

Someone who is contemplating an abortion should go to an orphanage or to a children's hospital and look at how they are living. They may not be living like you and I but, they have their friends, their enemies, their favorite T.V. shows, and they find joy in their lives just as we do, because they ARE a part of us. I wonder if you would have the nerve to ask them if they would have traded their lives for your orgasm or for your quest for a perfect person? I wonder what their answer would be?

Removal of the Second Doctor’s Signature Requirement In Order to Procure an Abortion

The Abortion Act in the UK allows abortion under certain circumstances, which must be agreed on by two separate doctors.

In practice, abortion is provided on demand, and the second doctor's signature is superflous. It has created an unessecary beaurocratic part of the process and it serves no purpose. Removal of the requirement would bring an outdated act in line with modern practice.

Why is this idea important?

The Abortion Act in the UK allows abortion under certain circumstances, which must be agreed on by two separate doctors.

In practice, abortion is provided on demand, and the second doctor's signature is superflous. It has created an unessecary beaurocratic part of the process and it serves no purpose. Removal of the requirement would bring an outdated act in line with modern practice.

Make it illegal to Murder a Foetus.

My suggestion is to define a point while a baby is in its mothers womb at which the baby in law becomes considered to be a "Human Being".

Under the current law a baby is not considered to be a human being until it is independent of its mother meaning it has left her womb. This means that if a mother naturally goes into labour after 9 months and she was stabbed killing the baby then no offence has been committed against the baby or as law calls "the foetus". this is despite the fact that had the baby been born that day it would have survived without complications.

I am no medical or legal expert I am merely a 17 year old student, but I personally think its disgusting that parents can have their child's life taken from them and there is no offence on the baby, I call it Murder. I ask anyone reading this who currently has a pregnancy in the family or close to the family, how does it make you feel that if someone where to harm the pregnant women therefore killing the baby, even if those actions where clearly intentional, no offence exists? its actually impossible to legally Murder a child while its in its mothers womb. And to any parent who is reading this, you should be angered at the thought that had your child been killed the day before their birth then apparently they have not been murdered. Children can be deprived of life without the law being broken. 

Why is this idea important?

My suggestion is to define a point while a baby is in its mothers womb at which the baby in law becomes considered to be a "Human Being".

Under the current law a baby is not considered to be a human being until it is independent of its mother meaning it has left her womb. This means that if a mother naturally goes into labour after 9 months and she was stabbed killing the baby then no offence has been committed against the baby or as law calls "the foetus". this is despite the fact that had the baby been born that day it would have survived without complications.

I am no medical or legal expert I am merely a 17 year old student, but I personally think its disgusting that parents can have their child's life taken from them and there is no offence on the baby, I call it Murder. I ask anyone reading this who currently has a pregnancy in the family or close to the family, how does it make you feel that if someone where to harm the pregnant women therefore killing the baby, even if those actions where clearly intentional, no offence exists? its actually impossible to legally Murder a child while its in its mothers womb. And to any parent who is reading this, you should be angered at the thought that had your child been killed the day before their birth then apparently they have not been murdered. Children can be deprived of life without the law being broken. 

Protect the rights of the unborn

The Abortion Act of 1967 should be repealed or at least heavily amended so that the rights of the unborn are protected against the practice of abortion. Specifically, a new/amended law should ensure that an unborn child is guaranteed the right to survive from the moment of conception except in some very limited circumstances (such as if the mother's life is at serious risk).

Why is this idea important?

The Abortion Act of 1967 should be repealed or at least heavily amended so that the rights of the unborn are protected against the practice of abortion. Specifically, a new/amended law should ensure that an unborn child is guaranteed the right to survive from the moment of conception except in some very limited circumstances (such as if the mother's life is at serious risk).

Abortion Act 1967

Although brought in allegedly to remove the scourge of back street abortionists, it has in fact been routinely abused such that abortion on demand, for reasons of convenience and very minor disability are de facto routine

Why is this idea important?

Although brought in allegedly to remove the scourge of back street abortionists, it has in fact been routinely abused such that abortion on demand, for reasons of convenience and very minor disability are de facto routine