Sacked for complaining about work on Facebook

It's shocking that a person can be sacked by their company for complaining about their job on Facebook, even if they haven't included details of where they work on their details page.

What happened to freedom of speech?

Why is this idea important?

It's shocking that a person can be sacked by their company for complaining about their job on Facebook, even if they haven't included details of where they work on their details page.

What happened to freedom of speech?

For the Coalition to alow Homosexual or bisexual men to give blood.

Its completely discriminatory. We aren't in the 1980's anymore so why positcute gay and bisexuals because that is there sexual orientation? 

Why is this idea important?

Its completely discriminatory. We aren't in the 1980's anymore so why positcute gay and bisexuals because that is there sexual orientation? 

Stop wasting parliaments time trying to repeal animal cruelty laws

No one on here is saying that livestock should be treated badly, dog fighting laws should be repealed, the RSPCA should be abolished. So in principal we agree that part of being a human is to be compassionate to 'lesser creatures' as I keep seeing animals referred too. 

Yet we are suggesting that we take up constitutional time debating other ways of being cruel to animals as if it is some assault on our civil liberties.

If we agree that we should be humane – keep livestock in good conditions, not tortures our pets, not neglect our animals and not mistreat the family budgerigar then it is inconsistent to say that certain animals and practices are civil liberty issues.

They aren't.  

As a society we have already accepted  humane treatment for animals as a standard – if it isn't humane you can't do it – simple really!  

 

 

Why is this idea important?

No one on here is saying that livestock should be treated badly, dog fighting laws should be repealed, the RSPCA should be abolished. So in principal we agree that part of being a human is to be compassionate to 'lesser creatures' as I keep seeing animals referred too. 

Yet we are suggesting that we take up constitutional time debating other ways of being cruel to animals as if it is some assault on our civil liberties.

If we agree that we should be humane – keep livestock in good conditions, not tortures our pets, not neglect our animals and not mistreat the family budgerigar then it is inconsistent to say that certain animals and practices are civil liberty issues.

They aren't.  

As a society we have already accepted  humane treatment for animals as a standard – if it isn't humane you can't do it – simple really!  

 

 

Reduce the powers of VOSA

It is a ridiculous situation where at a road side vehicle check a motor mechanic can decide if a driver will receive a fine or points.It should only be the police who can do this.It is all getting very Stalinistic .They have VEHICLE ENFORCEMENT printed on their vans.The only ones who should be enforcing any thing is the police and customs not motor mechanics.It's getting to the stage now where anyone can fine you.Big brother is watching.  

Why is this idea important?

It is a ridiculous situation where at a road side vehicle check a motor mechanic can decide if a driver will receive a fine or points.It should only be the police who can do this.It is all getting very Stalinistic .They have VEHICLE ENFORCEMENT printed on their vans.The only ones who should be enforcing any thing is the police and customs not motor mechanics.It's getting to the stage now where anyone can fine you.Big brother is watching.