Pay Back the Bailout Money

Major cuts are being proposed to keep the markets happy and reduce the interest payments we have to make. If we don't pay a substantial amount of the debt back quickly (hence the cuts) the banks will increase our interest rates and we risk further rate raises based on our credit rating with the banks.

Ok. If I'm not mistaken the banks and market system effectively went bankrupt themselves last year (hence the global bailout). Market forces where allowed to run themselves and pure capitalism virtutally consumed itself. Private greed turned into public debt.

Why now make further cuts into our public spending to support the bankrupt banks over charging us and using poor credit rating to force cuts. Our credit rating seemed ok to borrow £1trillion + last year from UK alone!!

So its time to turn the tables and request full repayment of the that bailout money so the debts and public deficit can be repaid in full. No public spending cuts required. If the money is not immediately repaid then interest payments should be significantly increased in line with credit rating defaults.

I also note when the banks bankrupt a company or person they seize assets to pay down as much of the debt as they can. Given the banks are promoting a human face and fair play then why can't we asset strip banks and bankers. Sending in bailiffs to sieze assets like banks accunts, investments, property and pocessions. We should raise a fortune. Whats good for the goose.

Why is this idea important?

Major cuts are being proposed to keep the markets happy and reduce the interest payments we have to make. If we don't pay a substantial amount of the debt back quickly (hence the cuts) the banks will increase our interest rates and we risk further rate raises based on our credit rating with the banks.

Ok. If I'm not mistaken the banks and market system effectively went bankrupt themselves last year (hence the global bailout). Market forces where allowed to run themselves and pure capitalism virtutally consumed itself. Private greed turned into public debt.

Why now make further cuts into our public spending to support the bankrupt banks over charging us and using poor credit rating to force cuts. Our credit rating seemed ok to borrow £1trillion + last year from UK alone!!

So its time to turn the tables and request full repayment of the that bailout money so the debts and public deficit can be repaid in full. No public spending cuts required. If the money is not immediately repaid then interest payments should be significantly increased in line with credit rating defaults.

I also note when the banks bankrupt a company or person they seize assets to pay down as much of the debt as they can. Given the banks are promoting a human face and fair play then why can't we asset strip banks and bankers. Sending in bailiffs to sieze assets like banks accunts, investments, property and pocessions. We should raise a fortune. Whats good for the goose.

Repeal European Union Membership

repealing European Union Membership would SAVE the British Economy overall 118billion. That is membership costs 118 BILLION pounds sterling a year. Most of that cost comes through European red tape and directives, directly costing each and every business thousand of pounds, or in government jargon, costing jobs and slowing growth and this could cause a double dip recession. The free trade agreements are good but doesn't Switzerland and Norway get all the benefits and minimum costs? So to send the recovery into overdrive axe the EU. It will reduce business costs, could increase employment and save the government billions.

 

Some facts on the EU

Every book loan under EU libarys cost 570 pounds

According to the German magazine Der Speigel, fraud committed in Brussels amounts to 1 million euros per day.

Every year 3.3Billion British Pounds of fish are caught in British territorial waters by non-British fisherman, ie. Spain fishes in our waters we don't fish in theirs.

 

Also the claim that "3million jobs" depends on EU membership" but the scientist who led the research publicly disowned this claim. His report said that few, if any, jobs would be lost if we left, because trade with Europe would continue. So vote down the Euopean Union, Nick Clegg has to listen to normal sane people eventually.

Why is this idea important?

repealing European Union Membership would SAVE the British Economy overall 118billion. That is membership costs 118 BILLION pounds sterling a year. Most of that cost comes through European red tape and directives, directly costing each and every business thousand of pounds, or in government jargon, costing jobs and slowing growth and this could cause a double dip recession. The free trade agreements are good but doesn't Switzerland and Norway get all the benefits and minimum costs? So to send the recovery into overdrive axe the EU. It will reduce business costs, could increase employment and save the government billions.

 

Some facts on the EU

Every book loan under EU libarys cost 570 pounds

According to the German magazine Der Speigel, fraud committed in Brussels amounts to 1 million euros per day.

Every year 3.3Billion British Pounds of fish are caught in British territorial waters by non-British fisherman, ie. Spain fishes in our waters we don't fish in theirs.

 

Also the claim that "3million jobs" depends on EU membership" but the scientist who led the research publicly disowned this claim. His report said that few, if any, jobs would be lost if we left, because trade with Europe would continue. So vote down the Euopean Union, Nick Clegg has to listen to normal sane people eventually.

Remove London’s increased pay

London's public sector workers and students (maybe other areas too) recieve more than thouse ouside the capital. This in effect makes them richer that the rest of england which then drives up the cost of living in and around the capital compared to outside.

Why is this idea important?

London's public sector workers and students (maybe other areas too) recieve more than thouse ouside the capital. This in effect makes them richer that the rest of england which then drives up the cost of living in and around the capital compared to outside.

Public Pay Rates should be Published

Everyone in public service (including those in Quangos) should have a job title that is published and each job title should have it's salary range published alongside it.  All public servants receiving over £100,000 should be named.

Why is this idea important?

Everyone in public service (including those in Quangos) should have a job title that is published and each job title should have it's salary range published alongside it.  All public servants receiving over £100,000 should be named.

Police should not patrol troubled areas alone

This CO-ALITION PROMISED they would not reduce front line services, it is rediculous to send ANY Police Officers to patrol areas alone they should be in twos at all times when they are trying to keep law and order on our streets. The "pledge" was to NOT touch front line services such as Police, Fire Service, and Paramedics so why are they targeted with the budget cuts. I bet not one MP or Government Member would work alone in the same circumstances. Yes the Police Fire and Paramedics knew the job would be tough when they joined I agree with that BUT it is redicuolous to put our front line service men and women in anymore un-neccesary danger than they already are.

Why is this idea important?

This CO-ALITION PROMISED they would not reduce front line services, it is rediculous to send ANY Police Officers to patrol areas alone they should be in twos at all times when they are trying to keep law and order on our streets. The "pledge" was to NOT touch front line services such as Police, Fire Service, and Paramedics so why are they targeted with the budget cuts. I bet not one MP or Government Member would work alone in the same circumstances. Yes the Police Fire and Paramedics knew the job would be tough when they joined I agree with that BUT it is redicuolous to put our front line service men and women in anymore un-neccesary danger than they already are.

Too Many Chiefs, Not Enough Injuns

It is quite obvious that in order to save money, the Government have to reduce jobs in the public sector. Local councils, the NHS, education currently are all suffer from over-management. The old joke about one council workman digging a hole in the road, while three managers, plus now of course the obligatory Health and Safety expert, stand and watch holding their clipboards is sadly today very true, and can longer be afforded. We need staff to actually do the job in hand. Too many justify their positions simply overseeing others, compiling useless statistics, attending 'important' meetings etc. The per head savings would also be greater for management reduction, so less jobs would be lost.

When considering staff reductions therefore, I suggest lay-offs should fall heaviest on the management/administration, thus keeping more of those who actually get the job done whilst making the greatest cost savings.

Why is this idea important?

It is quite obvious that in order to save money, the Government have to reduce jobs in the public sector. Local councils, the NHS, education currently are all suffer from over-management. The old joke about one council workman digging a hole in the road, while three managers, plus now of course the obligatory Health and Safety expert, stand and watch holding their clipboards is sadly today very true, and can longer be afforded. We need staff to actually do the job in hand. Too many justify their positions simply overseeing others, compiling useless statistics, attending 'important' meetings etc. The per head savings would also be greater for management reduction, so less jobs would be lost.

When considering staff reductions therefore, I suggest lay-offs should fall heaviest on the management/administration, thus keeping more of those who actually get the job done whilst making the greatest cost savings.

The new industry list for Britain

Create a list of new industries which Britain will develop as its long term economic base for the next 500 years which is sustainable and provides full employment for all able workers.

Why is this idea important?

Create a list of new industries which Britain will develop as its long term economic base for the next 500 years which is sustainable and provides full employment for all able workers.

Quangos! Why do we need to subsidise horse racing?

Ok not a law but the number of quangos is just plain ridiculous. Plus generally the salaries within them are greater than the market rate.

Just found out today that we have a quango for horse racing, the Horse Betting Levy board. Err am I missing something? Why is this sport receiving public funds to subsidise its activities? Its a commercial sport…

Why is this idea important?

Ok not a law but the number of quangos is just plain ridiculous. Plus generally the salaries within them are greater than the market rate.

Just found out today that we have a quango for horse racing, the Horse Betting Levy board. Err am I missing something? Why is this sport receiving public funds to subsidise its activities? Its a commercial sport…