Reform ASBO’s but don’t get rid of them!

I think the Government has been misleading on the fact that ASBO's do not work, using Breach figures as the reason to abolish them. I have personally found ASBO's to be a wonderful Invention and i undertand that Conservertaves do not want to be associated with things that the Labour brought in, so change the name reform them but do not remove them.  in the aspect of child ASBO's more responsability should be on the parents and they should have some sort of punihment for letting this carry on.

 

ASBO's take too long to get, can be time consuming and make the many victims wait too long for Peace. But they do offer respite to the people who have to put up with the poor behaviour for a small few.

Why is this idea important?

I think the Government has been misleading on the fact that ASBO's do not work, using Breach figures as the reason to abolish them. I have personally found ASBO's to be a wonderful Invention and i undertand that Conservertaves do not want to be associated with things that the Labour brought in, so change the name reform them but do not remove them.  in the aspect of child ASBO's more responsability should be on the parents and they should have some sort of punihment for letting this carry on.

 

ASBO's take too long to get, can be time consuming and make the many victims wait too long for Peace. But they do offer respite to the people who have to put up with the poor behaviour for a small few.

To amend the law which automatically gives Parental Responsibility to mothers

To restore the civil liberty of fathers, where their name was entered onto their child’s Birth Certificate prior to 01/12/2003, so that they automatically receive Parental Responsibility for that child (as they would have done if their child was born after 01/12/2003).

Why is this idea important?

To restore the civil liberty of fathers, where their name was entered onto their child’s Birth Certificate prior to 01/12/2003, so that they automatically receive Parental Responsibility for that child (as they would have done if their child was born after 01/12/2003).

For an obligatory parenting education scheme

How much do you have to know about road safety before you are allowed onto the roads? A fair amount.

How much do you have to know about law before you can become a lawyer? A huge amount.

How much do you have to know about children before you can have kids? Nothing.

I think people should have to complete a government-funded course on raising children within five years of having them and ideally before having them. The within-five-year rule would be to take unplanned pregnancies into account.

What happens if you don't complete the course within five years? Your child is repossessed by an adoption agency. To claim it back, you must simply complete the course.

Why is this idea important?

How much do you have to know about road safety before you are allowed onto the roads? A fair amount.

How much do you have to know about law before you can become a lawyer? A huge amount.

How much do you have to know about children before you can have kids? Nothing.

I think people should have to complete a government-funded course on raising children within five years of having them and ideally before having them. The within-five-year rule would be to take unplanned pregnancies into account.

What happens if you don't complete the course within five years? Your child is repossessed by an adoption agency. To claim it back, you must simply complete the course.

Remove restrictive checks for parents with children

To prevent reoccurrences of incidents such as this:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/leicester/10558648.stm

The presumption of guilt in this country is ridiculous. Parents should be able to support their children at sports days and other events. This kind of extreme paranoia prevents parents from seeing important moments in the lives of their children.

Why is this idea important?

To prevent reoccurrences of incidents such as this:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/leicester/10558648.stm

The presumption of guilt in this country is ridiculous. Parents should be able to support their children at sports days and other events. This kind of extreme paranoia prevents parents from seeing important moments in the lives of their children.

Remove the requirement to notify the government of “private fostering”

If I were to arrange for my 15 year old child to stay with a friend for 28 days over the summer holidays, I would be legally obliged ot notify the government, and a social services would need to assess the friends my child is staying with.

Parents should be able  to make arrangements for their childrens' care without unnescessary interference from the government. The requirement to notify the government of "private fostering" should be removed.

Parents are responsible for the welfare of their children and the government should not intervene in private child care arrangenents unless there is reason to suspect a child may be at risk of harm.

There is even a government web site which encourages citzens to snoop on each other in order to report suspected cases of "private fostering" which the government may be unaware of.

This site should be abolished to save costs.

Why is this idea important?

If I were to arrange for my 15 year old child to stay with a friend for 28 days over the summer holidays, I would be legally obliged ot notify the government, and a social services would need to assess the friends my child is staying with.

Parents should be able  to make arrangements for their childrens' care without unnescessary interference from the government. The requirement to notify the government of "private fostering" should be removed.

Parents are responsible for the welfare of their children and the government should not intervene in private child care arrangenents unless there is reason to suspect a child may be at risk of harm.

There is even a government web site which encourages citzens to snoop on each other in order to report suspected cases of "private fostering" which the government may be unaware of.

This site should be abolished to save costs.

Raising Britain’s Children

Personally I think that a number of social problems such a crime, obesity, poor health, binge drinking, drug culture, teenage pregnancy, etc can be solved with one simple solution. Parenting classes. Ensuring that expectant mothers and fathers attend classes which teach them about raising children.

Why is this idea important?

Personally I think that a number of social problems such a crime, obesity, poor health, binge drinking, drug culture, teenage pregnancy, etc can be solved with one simple solution. Parenting classes. Ensuring that expectant mothers and fathers attend classes which teach them about raising children.

Allow parents to slap their children within reason

If asking nicely doesn’t work, because we’re human some must remember not robots people need to raise their voice, if that doesn’t work you need to raise it further, if that doesn’t work you should be allowed to warn them of a slap, if that doesn’t work a slap needs to be administered as you shouldn’t really change your mind at this point. When I slap my children they laugh and say that wasn’t a slap, I try a bit harder and they still take the Mickey, it stiill needs to be within reason i know but The government doesn’t know this concept I believe. Now when I ‘ m abroad I slap them outside without fear of being reported. Going to their room doesn’t work because they love it… I don’ t want to raise incorrigible children who turn into adults no one can control and then getting someone like Brown saying you see how you sort it out. I’d like to see how he copes. Now you have parent counseling teachers not using the word slapping as it is not p.c. And people not knowing how to cope with situations themselves, get paid and in so many words expect you to deal with it, as the’y’re your kids after all. Now i have kids who tell me what to do and I want to cry because I am the mother but I always have to worry on what is legal or what will bring others whose children’s current behavior we don’t know away from us. When my children turn to teenagers and I tell them don’t smoke or drink or take drugs who is there to support me if they do? It will be worse someone unrelated will come probably two or more holding them from their arms, menacing them and put them in a room with a toilet. Can’t they see that. Some force verbal or not has to be used at some point with kids from an early age? Also when they get into gangs after you repeatedly tell them not. To but they still do for many reasons one may be because they do what they like and there has never been anyone firm enough, just someone saying you cannot do this, for fear that anything more may be seen as abuse,like that poor mum who got followed by a policeman because she warned the children of a good hiding at home, her name is now on record. If one of my children dies in gang warfare, everyone else gets a goodnight sleep but me. I need to impose boundaries on my children and they can’t Always be soft again I stress within reason.

Why is this idea important?

If asking nicely doesn’t work, because we’re human some must remember not robots people need to raise their voice, if that doesn’t work you need to raise it further, if that doesn’t work you should be allowed to warn them of a slap, if that doesn’t work a slap needs to be administered as you shouldn’t really change your mind at this point. When I slap my children they laugh and say that wasn’t a slap, I try a bit harder and they still take the Mickey, it stiill needs to be within reason i know but The government doesn’t know this concept I believe. Now when I ‘ m abroad I slap them outside without fear of being reported. Going to their room doesn’t work because they love it… I don’ t want to raise incorrigible children who turn into adults no one can control and then getting someone like Brown saying you see how you sort it out. I’d like to see how he copes. Now you have parent counseling teachers not using the word slapping as it is not p.c. And people not knowing how to cope with situations themselves, get paid and in so many words expect you to deal with it, as the’y’re your kids after all. Now i have kids who tell me what to do and I want to cry because I am the mother but I always have to worry on what is legal or what will bring others whose children’s current behavior we don’t know away from us. When my children turn to teenagers and I tell them don’t smoke or drink or take drugs who is there to support me if they do? It will be worse someone unrelated will come probably two or more holding them from their arms, menacing them and put them in a room with a toilet. Can’t they see that. Some force verbal or not has to be used at some point with kids from an early age? Also when they get into gangs after you repeatedly tell them not. To but they still do for many reasons one may be because they do what they like and there has never been anyone firm enough, just someone saying you cannot do this, for fear that anything more may be seen as abuse,like that poor mum who got followed by a policeman because she warned the children of a good hiding at home, her name is now on record. If one of my children dies in gang warfare, everyone else gets a goodnight sleep but me. I need to impose boundaries on my children and they can’t Always be soft again I stress within reason.

Please leave home-educators alone

We recognise the positive response of the current government to home-educators in the UK. We are grateful that the Ed Balls/Graham Badmn recommendations for the registration and monitoring of home educated children by LAs have been axed.

We want to make sure that the current legislation reains as it is so that parents are able to make their own judgements regarding their own children's education.

Why is this idea important?

We recognise the positive response of the current government to home-educators in the UK. We are grateful that the Ed Balls/Graham Badmn recommendations for the registration and monitoring of home educated children by LAs have been axed.

We want to make sure that the current legislation reains as it is so that parents are able to make their own judgements regarding their own children's education.

Abolish laws which prevent the disabled from parenting

The disabled can parent with support. Currently the mentally disabled parent is not allowed to live with their child nor to see there child regularly. This causes emotional and mental harm to children and there parents.. This defeats the objective of the the law in itself of preventing harm to children. So it should be abolished

Why is this idea important?

The disabled can parent with support. Currently the mentally disabled parent is not allowed to live with their child nor to see there child regularly. This causes emotional and mental harm to children and there parents.. This defeats the objective of the the law in itself of preventing harm to children. So it should be abolished

Repeal the Child Poverty Act 2010

Scrap this unnecessary legislation. Children do not have their own income on the whole, nor can they own property. Their relative wealth or poverty is intrinsically tied up with that of their parents, and so the real issue is family or household poverty. The term "child poverty" is almost Dickensian in it's sentimentality and the whole issue seems to be one of PR and vote winning rather than any sensible, necessary measure.

Why is this idea important?

Scrap this unnecessary legislation. Children do not have their own income on the whole, nor can they own property. Their relative wealth or poverty is intrinsically tied up with that of their parents, and so the real issue is family or household poverty. The term "child poverty" is almost Dickensian in it's sentimentality and the whole issue seems to be one of PR and vote winning rather than any sensible, necessary measure.

Remove Child Benefit and Pregnancy Grant for under 21’s

End the financial incentives for young people to get pregnant early in life by axing the pregnancy grant and restricting Child Benefit to those over the age of 21. This will encourage people to think of a career, stay in education, learn a trade or otherwise contribut to society.

Why is this idea important?

End the financial incentives for young people to get pregnant early in life by axing the pregnancy grant and restricting Child Benefit to those over the age of 21. This will encourage people to think of a career, stay in education, learn a trade or otherwise contribut to society.

Stop Mothers divorcing their children from Fathers and Grandparents.

It is now well known in the Western world that most custodial parents of divorced children cause these children to have Parental Alienation Syndrome.  It is so well known that books have been written about it you can buy on Amazon.  It is well known that 50% of children lose touch with their absent parent after divorce.  What is not realised is why these children become divorced.  Their mothers use various tactics which, even when the Courts recognise it, nothing is done about this child abuse.  Judges will threaten the mother with jail when they redefine access for the umpteenth time but they will never carry out their threat as it would show up the Court's bad custody decision.  Make it mandatory on Judges that, if they see this child abuse, often shown by having the absent parent applying to redefine access which is breaking down frequently, then the Judges must jail the Mother (who it usually is) and turn over custody to the Father, with no judicial leeway whatsoever.

Read about it from the report by Stan Hayward at www.coeffic.demon.co.uk/pas.htm

Parrental Alienation Syndrome IS child abuse!

It is written in the Children Act 1989 that the claim of the Father is equal to the claim of the mother.  Since the OPEC countries hiked up the price of fuel; and therefore energy in general, in the late 1970's, most people know that you can no longer run a family on one parent as the wage earner.  Most families need both parents to work.  This is reflected in the 1989 Children Act.  However the Courts still, decades later, think that it is still the 1960's and award residence orders on the basis that it is the Father's role to be the breadwinner.  In the 21st century this is not true, with many wives earning more than the husband.  Yet still residence orders 91% are given to the mother.  It has moved towards reality by only a few percentage points – from 97% in the 1980's.

Clearly the Family Courts are blatently flouting the Statutory Law that the claim of the Father is equal to that of the Mother.

Once a child is off the breast there is nothing that a Mother can give that child that the Father cannot do better,  I make this claim on the basis that a Father's parenting is more CONSISTENT from day to day than most mothers' parenting, possibly because they are women whose oestrus cycle makes them feel different each day.

Most problems with young people and adults, whether in education or prison or probation services, are caused by inconsistent parenting.  I am a secondary teacher and see it every day.

I was a Registered Childminder for twelve years and none of the 250 children I brought up for other people ended up in the criminal justice system.  I taught parenting to dysfunctional families for Social Services during that time.  I was head hunted as a consultant to Suffolk Social Services to encourage men into primary care.  I was headhunted by the Probation Service too.

Forcing Judges in the Family Courts to obey Statutory Law as outlined above would have far reaching effects to the benefit of our society, see below.  This could possibly be done by sacking them if their results for residence orders are not within a few percentage points of 50%.  Full accountability!

Only then would our children recieve their statutory right to be brought up by the better parent.

Why is this idea important?

It is now well known in the Western world that most custodial parents of divorced children cause these children to have Parental Alienation Syndrome.  It is so well known that books have been written about it you can buy on Amazon.  It is well known that 50% of children lose touch with their absent parent after divorce.  What is not realised is why these children become divorced.  Their mothers use various tactics which, even when the Courts recognise it, nothing is done about this child abuse.  Judges will threaten the mother with jail when they redefine access for the umpteenth time but they will never carry out their threat as it would show up the Court's bad custody decision.  Make it mandatory on Judges that, if they see this child abuse, often shown by having the absent parent applying to redefine access which is breaking down frequently, then the Judges must jail the Mother (who it usually is) and turn over custody to the Father, with no judicial leeway whatsoever.

Read about it from the report by Stan Hayward at www.coeffic.demon.co.uk/pas.htm

Parrental Alienation Syndrome IS child abuse!

It is written in the Children Act 1989 that the claim of the Father is equal to the claim of the mother.  Since the OPEC countries hiked up the price of fuel; and therefore energy in general, in the late 1970's, most people know that you can no longer run a family on one parent as the wage earner.  Most families need both parents to work.  This is reflected in the 1989 Children Act.  However the Courts still, decades later, think that it is still the 1960's and award residence orders on the basis that it is the Father's role to be the breadwinner.  In the 21st century this is not true, with many wives earning more than the husband.  Yet still residence orders 91% are given to the mother.  It has moved towards reality by only a few percentage points – from 97% in the 1980's.

Clearly the Family Courts are blatently flouting the Statutory Law that the claim of the Father is equal to that of the Mother.

Once a child is off the breast there is nothing that a Mother can give that child that the Father cannot do better,  I make this claim on the basis that a Father's parenting is more CONSISTENT from day to day than most mothers' parenting, possibly because they are women whose oestrus cycle makes them feel different each day.

Most problems with young people and adults, whether in education or prison or probation services, are caused by inconsistent parenting.  I am a secondary teacher and see it every day.

I was a Registered Childminder for twelve years and none of the 250 children I brought up for other people ended up in the criminal justice system.  I taught parenting to dysfunctional families for Social Services during that time.  I was head hunted as a consultant to Suffolk Social Services to encourage men into primary care.  I was headhunted by the Probation Service too.

Forcing Judges in the Family Courts to obey Statutory Law as outlined above would have far reaching effects to the benefit of our society, see below.  This could possibly be done by sacking them if their results for residence orders are not within a few percentage points of 50%.  Full accountability!

Only then would our children recieve their statutory right to be brought up by the better parent.

Get rid of the CSA

The Child Support Act needs to be completely re-thought from scratch and it's henchman the wretched CSA (Child Support Agency) should be completely scrapped. The Act and the Agency do not provide a fair or workable system for providing or accessing the financial needs of familes. The enforcement methods and tactics the CSA have developed do not serve either the Parent with care or the Non-resident family at all well. The injustices that have eminated form this system are enormous. If anybody has any doubts about this just read some of the case examples provided on http://www.csahell.com The whole system is quite farcical.

Why is this idea important?

The Child Support Act needs to be completely re-thought from scratch and it's henchman the wretched CSA (Child Support Agency) should be completely scrapped. The Act and the Agency do not provide a fair or workable system for providing or accessing the financial needs of familes. The enforcement methods and tactics the CSA have developed do not serve either the Parent with care or the Non-resident family at all well. The injustices that have eminated form this system are enormous. If anybody has any doubts about this just read some of the case examples provided on http://www.csahell.com The whole system is quite farcical.

Get rid of the CSA

The Child Support Act needs to be completely re-thought from scratch and it's henchmen the wretched CSA (Child Support Agency) should be completely scrapped. The Act and the Agency do not provide a fair or workable system for providing or accessing the financial needs of familes. The enforcement methods and tactics the CSA have developed do not serve either the Parent with care or the Non-resident family at all well. The injustices that have eminated form this system are enormous. If anybody has any doubts about this just read some of the case examples provided on http://www.csahell.com The whole system is quite farcical.

Why is this idea important?

The Child Support Act needs to be completely re-thought from scratch and it's henchmen the wretched CSA (Child Support Agency) should be completely scrapped. The Act and the Agency do not provide a fair or workable system for providing or accessing the financial needs of familes. The enforcement methods and tactics the CSA have developed do not serve either the Parent with care or the Non-resident family at all well. The injustices that have eminated form this system are enormous. If anybody has any doubts about this just read some of the case examples provided on http://www.csahell.com The whole system is quite farcical.

Get rid of the CSA

The Child Support Act needs to be completely re-thought from scratch and it's henchmen the wretched CSA (Child Support Agency) should be completely scrapped. The Act and the Agency do not provide a fair or workable system for providing or accessing the financial needs of familes. The enforcement methods and tactics the CSA have developed do not serve either the Parent with care or the Non-resident family at all well. The injustices that have eminated form this system are enormous. If anybody has any doubts about this just read some of the case examples provided on http://www.csahell.com The whole system is quite farcical.

Why is this idea important?

The Child Support Act needs to be completely re-thought from scratch and it's henchmen the wretched CSA (Child Support Agency) should be completely scrapped. The Act and the Agency do not provide a fair or workable system for providing or accessing the financial needs of familes. The enforcement methods and tactics the CSA have developed do not serve either the Parent with care or the Non-resident family at all well. The injustices that have eminated form this system are enormous. If anybody has any doubts about this just read some of the case examples provided on http://www.csahell.com The whole system is quite farcical.