Repeal of European Communities Act 1972

It is very clear that the vast majority of the British population would now be in favour of a withdrawal from Europe.  The original concept of a Trading Community has developed in to a situation where every facet of British life from economic, political, social is being dramatically  adversely affected by Europeans outside of the U.K wishing to be fully in control of an integrated Europe.  This is far, far beyond the initial intention and well beyond the intentions and vision of the British people at the time of the Referendum.  They voted for "economic co-operation."

We as a nation cannot afford (and should not support) the economic, political and social instability of so much of Europe and the clear intention of Germany and France to dominate.

We can prosper without the weight of those countries around our neck and without doubt the advantages will far outweigh the disadvantages as we return to true British standards.

Why is this idea important?

It is very clear that the vast majority of the British population would now be in favour of a withdrawal from Europe.  The original concept of a Trading Community has developed in to a situation where every facet of British life from economic, political, social is being dramatically  adversely affected by Europeans outside of the U.K wishing to be fully in control of an integrated Europe.  This is far, far beyond the initial intention and well beyond the intentions and vision of the British people at the time of the Referendum.  They voted for "economic co-operation."

We as a nation cannot afford (and should not support) the economic, political and social instability of so much of Europe and the clear intention of Germany and France to dominate.

We can prosper without the weight of those countries around our neck and without doubt the advantages will far outweigh the disadvantages as we return to true British standards.

Abolish the Supreme Court.

This is a creature of the Blair / Brown NuLabour years and should be abolished along with all it's 'rulings'.

It's main role was to hear appeals from courts in the United Kingdom concerning commercial disputes, family matters, judicial review claims against public authorities and issues under the Human Rights Act. (Ah, the good 'ol catch all HRA).

They now seem to be outreaching their authority. 

"Homosexuals who cannot live an open life in their own countries without fear of persecution should be entitled to asylum in Britain, the Supreme Court said on Wednesday."

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/22/20100707/tuk-uk-britain-gay-fa6b408.html

 

 

Why is this idea important?

This is a creature of the Blair / Brown NuLabour years and should be abolished along with all it's 'rulings'.

It's main role was to hear appeals from courts in the United Kingdom concerning commercial disputes, family matters, judicial review claims against public authorities and issues under the Human Rights Act. (Ah, the good 'ol catch all HRA).

They now seem to be outreaching their authority. 

"Homosexuals who cannot live an open life in their own countries without fear of persecution should be entitled to asylum in Britain, the Supreme Court said on Wednesday."

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/22/20100707/tuk-uk-britain-gay-fa6b408.html

 

 

EU payments

The repeal of all acts requiring the UK to make payments or contributions to the European Union. This should only be replaced with an act to make financial contributions after the government has received a mandate as a result of a National Referendum. All taxpayers should have the option of refusing any of their tax monies goes to the European Union.

Why is this idea important?

The repeal of all acts requiring the UK to make payments or contributions to the European Union. This should only be replaced with an act to make financial contributions after the government has received a mandate as a result of a National Referendum. All taxpayers should have the option of refusing any of their tax monies goes to the European Union.

Repeal of the 1973, Treaty of Accession, bringing the UK, into the EEC,

REPEAL THIS HENOUS ACT OF PARLIAMENT THAT SUBJEGATED BRITISH SOVEREIGNTY AND THE BRITISH PEOPLE TO A FORIEGN POWER IN BRUSSLLS.

THE TREAT OF ACCESSION IS THE CENTRAL PLANK OF EU CONTROL IN BRITAIN, REPEAL THIS AND THE OTHER EU TREATIES, LISBON, MAASTRICHT, AMSTERDAM AND OTHERS HAVE NO BASISIN UK LAW, AND ARE THEREFORE SCRAPPED ALONG WITH EU MEMBERSHIP.

THE EUROPEAN UNION IS A FEDERAL SUPER-STATE AND THAT IS NOT WHAT WAS PROPOSED OR VOTED FOR BY THE BRITISH PEOPLE.  THE ACCESSION TO THE EU BY GREAT BRITAIN WAS PERPETRATED ON A LIE AND THEREFORE HAS NO LEGITEMACY IN LAW OR ANY MORAL FOUNDATION.

BRITAIN IS AN INDEPENDENT SOVERIEGN STATE NOT A PROVINCE OF A FORIEGN EMPIRE.



 

Why is this idea important?

REPEAL THIS HENOUS ACT OF PARLIAMENT THAT SUBJEGATED BRITISH SOVEREIGNTY AND THE BRITISH PEOPLE TO A FORIEGN POWER IN BRUSSLLS.

THE TREAT OF ACCESSION IS THE CENTRAL PLANK OF EU CONTROL IN BRITAIN, REPEAL THIS AND THE OTHER EU TREATIES, LISBON, MAASTRICHT, AMSTERDAM AND OTHERS HAVE NO BASISIN UK LAW, AND ARE THEREFORE SCRAPPED ALONG WITH EU MEMBERSHIP.

THE EUROPEAN UNION IS A FEDERAL SUPER-STATE AND THAT IS NOT WHAT WAS PROPOSED OR VOTED FOR BY THE BRITISH PEOPLE.  THE ACCESSION TO THE EU BY GREAT BRITAIN WAS PERPETRATED ON A LIE AND THEREFORE HAS NO LEGITEMACY IN LAW OR ANY MORAL FOUNDATION.

BRITAIN IS AN INDEPENDENT SOVERIEGN STATE NOT A PROVINCE OF A FORIEGN EMPIRE.



 

Leave the EU – that should stop most of the daft, expensive legislation

Leaving the EU should stop most of the daft, expensive legislation which this site was set up to do. Most of the ideas proposed on this site would be impossible to repeal because the are binding on our government. Euro diktat has precedence over UK law in many cases.

Most of our legislation is now directed from Brussels. The government you elect here in the UK can rarely do anything about laws, regulations and bureacracy from the EU. Most of these things have been created after lobbying by special interest groups or big business. They have the deep pockets to employ specialist PR agents who – at best – wine and dine the EU bureacrats.

Even where the legislations sounds to be positive, it is usually at enormous cost.

Every year, thousands of new rules and regulations are published producing a monumental nuisance for almost every organisation in the country.

Some we know are EU-inspired, but other laws are less well known as EU in origin. In fact most of our legislation comes from over the water.  But the majority of EU laws and regulations are expensive to implement and monitor, and ineffective in not producing the intended effect; some are harmful, and of course some actually useful.

Why is this idea important?

Leaving the EU should stop most of the daft, expensive legislation which this site was set up to do. Most of the ideas proposed on this site would be impossible to repeal because the are binding on our government. Euro diktat has precedence over UK law in many cases.

Most of our legislation is now directed from Brussels. The government you elect here in the UK can rarely do anything about laws, regulations and bureacracy from the EU. Most of these things have been created after lobbying by special interest groups or big business. They have the deep pockets to employ specialist PR agents who – at best – wine and dine the EU bureacrats.

Even where the legislations sounds to be positive, it is usually at enormous cost.

Every year, thousands of new rules and regulations are published producing a monumental nuisance for almost every organisation in the country.

Some we know are EU-inspired, but other laws are less well known as EU in origin. In fact most of our legislation comes from over the water.  But the majority of EU laws and regulations are expensive to implement and monitor, and ineffective in not producing the intended effect; some are harmful, and of course some actually useful.