The Human Rights Act has become a haven of protection for those who wish to promote harm in various ways to the citizens of the United Kingdom. Religious clerics and other relgious zealots have avoided deportation and othjer sanctions on the grounds that they infringe their Human Rights yet they have themselves preached hatred and worse against the ordinary citizens of the United Kingdom.
The courts must have the freedom to deal with such people regardless of whether, or not, the offenders may, or may not, be treated badly in the country of origin. If these offenders are found to be objectionable to the UK is it surprising, therefore, that they may be treated harshly back in their own country?