Retain FM radio

Image source Tuesday 30 December 2014 20.58 GMT

As part of the digital Britain report, it was proposed that national FM radio be switched off to free up bandwidth for DAB broadcasts. I believe that FM radio should be retained. I also believe that if we are to switch to a digital format, there are several formats which have considerable advantages over DAB.

I suggested to the last government that FM should be retained and DAB allowed to die. Their response was that DAB had to proceed since there were already a few million DAB sets in the UK. The fact that there are hundreds of millions of FM receivers in the UK seemed lost on them.

Why does this matter?

FM is superior to DAB for the following reasons:

1) From the point of view of the broadcaster and the listener, DAB is more expensive to run than FM. It consumes considerably more electricity.

2) Due to point 1, running DAB from batteries is particularly expensive. This effectively stops many people from using DAB as a truly portable device.

3) Sound quality on DAB can be reasonable compared to a very cheap FM receiver, but comparing like for like prices, FM tends to sound much better. Where reception is marginal, voices carried on FM can still be understood. On DAB, with poor reception, much worse distortion of the signal can occur including drop-outs to complete silence.

4) The DAB standard is based on 30 year old technology. It has been superseded by many other standards. Nearly all other countries which are adopting digital radio are opting for one of the more modern standards. This will mean that people using DAB in car entertainment will be unable to receive radio if driving their cars abroad. It will also drive up the price of DAB.

5) There is a significant time delay in the encoding and decoding of the DAB signal. This delay will vary between different receivers so it is impossible to compensate for. This means that the time signal used on the radio will be useless.

6) Due to the frequency of the DAB signal, it can be blocked by metal used in the construction of modern buildings (Faraday Cage effect).  The FM signal is much less susceptible to this.

7) Most families have several FM radios: kitchen, radio alarm, car radio, hifi etc. Replacing all of these with DAB will result in huge expense to the listener. It will also result in hundreds of millions of FM sets ending up in land fill.

Highlighted posts


3 Responses to Retain FM radio

  1. Justin Phillips says:

    Great idea. The sound quality of FM is superior to DAB too. Let FM exist for independent radio stations too, in parallel with DAB.

  2. will says:

    I had no idea they wanted to turn analogue FM off.

    The sound is much better and more natural on FM. DAB sounds like a poor quality low bitrate (96k? Mp3)

    Finding the FM stations by frequency makes sense, it is difficult to find stations on DAB.

    I still use AM as well as FM!
    I drive old cars with factory fitted radios and I don’t want to hack up the dash to fit some modern junk.
    My dad has a DAB, its horrible.

    You can get local pirate stations on FM. Sometimes fun.

    Internet radio will take over sooner or later so as far as I am concerned DAB is already obsolete and redundant.

    FM wasn’t and isn’t broke.. so don’t ‘fix’ it.

  3. Dag Crawford says:

    This will open the door for Radio Moscow and China Radio to replace our BBC for all those listeners in the highlands and islands wholly dependent on AM (longwaves and shortwaves) to get a signal. Remember there are a stream of visitors here in summer.

Comment on this idea

Good idea? Bad idea? Let us know your thoughts.


back to top