Add Your Idea

Right to trial by Jury (more than just reverting to the 1997 positon)

Comment 29th July 2010

People should have the absolute right to insist on a trial by Jury for charges like common assault and minor theft.

Why does this matter?

Because convictons for thease sorts of crime are life and liberty ending.  If any charges warrent a trial by jury then thease charges do because they are charges that cause the accuser to quite likely go to prisson and, more impornantly, they are cahrges which cause you to be labeled, by socierty, as a "propper criminal" (unlike, for example, a speeding fine).

But basically I feel that if I were in this position, I'd want a jury trial (or at least a right to a jury trial)

I sat in on a case today (just in the public gallary), an assault / battery, where the case come down to one person's word agaisnt a couple of others.

I would have found the defendent not guilty, and the DJ found him guilty.  I'm not saying that this was a miscarridge of justice (although I belive it might have been) and I don't know how a jury of 12 people would have decided the case but I think the defendent should have been given that chance.

Furthermore I know that his perception was that he wanted a jury trial (from overheard snippets of conversation he had with his solicitor).  He clearly did not feel that jusitice was being done and he would have rather had a jury trial.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Highlighted posts


Comment on this idea

Good idea? Bad idea? Let us know your thoughts.


Back to top
Add Your Idea