Crowdsourcing changes to UK law
To restore the UK to an independent nation state and save £7.6billion p.a by repealing the European Communities Act 1972 and subsequent EU Acts enabling us to leave the European Union as soon as possible.
To restore the UK to an independent nation state and save £7.6billion p.a by repealing the European Communities Act 1972 and subsequent EU Acts enabling us to leave the European Union as soon as possible.
Because as it is presently enforced it violates ones right to PRIVACY.The right to the PEACEFUL ENJOYMENT OF ONES HOME AND PROPERTY and in certain cases THE RIGHT TO LIFE itself.
The responsibility for council tax should be placed back onto the individual where every one living in an L.A. area should be registered and made responsible for paying the tax.With exceptions for hardship.
Let those European anti's remember that it is the ordinary people who benefit most from Eouropean law.
Because as it is presently enforced it violates ones right to PRIVACY.The right to the PEACEFUL ENJOYMENT OF ONES HOME AND PROPERTY and in certain cases THE RIGHT TO LIFE itself.
The responsibility for council tax should be placed back onto the individual where every one living in an L.A. area should be registered and made responsible for paying the tax.With exceptions for hardship.
Let those European anti's remember that it is the ordinary people who benefit most from Eouropean law.
Hello,As a long term Motorhomer/campervan user i have noticed maybe a loop hole or unworkable/unfair use of our individual countries motor taxes etc.
I'm not sure if i can explain properly,i hope you understand what i'm trying to convey,but for instance,we are ALL EU citizens now,apparantly all abide by the same rules and regs,my country the UK ,has certain rules and regs regardings vehicles,stating we need an MOT every year,road TAX for use of the roads and a valid INSURANCE,paid yearly and also valid for that time,as far as i'm aware,so do all the other EU countries…
So,my point is,if i am away from the UK,and my Insurance/MOTor Tax runs out,I am in fact breaking the law,not only in the UK (and i'm not there,maybe in Spain at the time) or the EU law.
Why cant EU road users be classed the same,and for their convenience be able to recieve and purchase these documents ,ANYWHERE in the EU,as an example,i overstayed a long holiday while travelling Europe,i had to stop said holiday when noticing documents about to expire ! thus a long rushed 2000 mile journey back to the UK,to get the out dated TAX,that i hadn't or wouldn't have used (as being out of the country for 6 months !) an MOT,where as ANY qualified mot station in the EU could have made sure my vehicle was safe (as thats what its for) and that INSURANCE be purchased in any insurance broker (online or in that particular EU country ) as for instance,a Bulgarian can get EU cover insurance with even added perks of a green card that allows him a greater number of countries of cover,it also covers him for the UK !! but the same Bulgarian/Spanish/Italian would have the same problem as myself and have to travel the 1000/2000 miles back to their country of origin,to be lawfull again,which seems in this computer ,open borders EU countries,rather ludicrous.
Can anyone see my point ? please make a comment,and any Govt official,please look into this,before someone takes it to a tribunal/law courts …from a EU road user,with rights ???
Hello,As a long term Motorhomer/campervan user i have noticed maybe a loop hole or unworkable/unfair use of our individual countries motor taxes etc.
I'm not sure if i can explain properly,i hope you understand what i'm trying to convey,but for instance,we are ALL EU citizens now,apparantly all abide by the same rules and regs,my country the UK ,has certain rules and regs regardings vehicles,stating we need an MOT every year,road TAX for use of the roads and a valid INSURANCE,paid yearly and also valid for that time,as far as i'm aware,so do all the other EU countries…
So,my point is,if i am away from the UK,and my Insurance/MOTor Tax runs out,I am in fact breaking the law,not only in the UK (and i'm not there,maybe in Spain at the time) or the EU law.
Why cant EU road users be classed the same,and for their convenience be able to recieve and purchase these documents ,ANYWHERE in the EU,as an example,i overstayed a long holiday while travelling Europe,i had to stop said holiday when noticing documents about to expire ! thus a long rushed 2000 mile journey back to the UK,to get the out dated TAX,that i hadn't or wouldn't have used (as being out of the country for 6 months !) an MOT,where as ANY qualified mot station in the EU could have made sure my vehicle was safe (as thats what its for) and that INSURANCE be purchased in any insurance broker (online or in that particular EU country ) as for instance,a Bulgarian can get EU cover insurance with even added perks of a green card that allows him a greater number of countries of cover,it also covers him for the UK !! but the same Bulgarian/Spanish/Italian would have the same problem as myself and have to travel the 1000/2000 miles back to their country of origin,to be lawfull again,which seems in this computer ,open borders EU countries,rather ludicrous.
Can anyone see my point ? please make a comment,and any Govt official,please look into this,before someone takes it to a tribunal/law courts …from a EU road user,with rights ???
When I worked in retail a few years ago, a lot of the HGV delivery drivers where agency drivers from Poland. And what I noticed was, they all had trouble turning their waggons to our delivery entrance. They all tried cutting corners as if driving a car, and they all kept getting stuck! I had to physically walk them along the road and tell them exactly where to start their turn in order to get round the corner. They didn't have a clue!!
I mentioned this to one of the English drivers and he informed me that the Polish drivers had never past HGV driving tests. They where all driving HGV waggons on agracultural licences. Seems if you can get a licence to drive a tractor or other farm vehicle in Poland, then that qualifies you to drive a HGV in this country.
So scrap the law that allows this to happen and make everyone pass the same tests.
When I worked in retail a few years ago, a lot of the HGV delivery drivers where agency drivers from Poland. And what I noticed was, they all had trouble turning their waggons to our delivery entrance. They all tried cutting corners as if driving a car, and they all kept getting stuck! I had to physically walk them along the road and tell them exactly where to start their turn in order to get round the corner. They didn't have a clue!!
I mentioned this to one of the English drivers and he informed me that the Polish drivers had never past HGV driving tests. They where all driving HGV waggons on agracultural licences. Seems if you can get a licence to drive a tractor or other farm vehicle in Poland, then that qualifies you to drive a HGV in this country.
So scrap the law that allows this to happen and make everyone pass the same tests.
Simply that the United Kingdom withdraws from full membership of the European Union and all regulations in this country originating from the EU be annulled. Thereafter the British Parliament will be sovereign in determining which European legislation is operative in this country and for how long.
Simply that the United Kingdom withdraws from full membership of the European Union and all regulations in this country originating from the EU be annulled. Thereafter the British Parliament will be sovereign in determining which European legislation is operative in this country and for how long.
Repeal the Human rights Act and leave Europe
Repeal the Human rights Act and leave Europe
The U.K. would almost certainly be much better off without full membership of the European Union. However immediate total withdrawal would cause too many problems. Piecemeal withdrawal by opting out of one area at a time would more practical.
We would no doubt be told by Brussels that we may not. However the Queen in Parliament has the power to repeal legislation and if necessary abrogate treaties.
As a start we should opt out of the the common fisheries policy that has all but destroyed the British fishing industry, and caused huge losses of fish stocks. We should follow the example of Iceland, among others, to claim maximum territorial waters reserved for our fishermen. We need to set up large fishing free zones to allow stocks to recover and spread out from them. Other nations have tried this and it works. The few areas in U.K. waters where this has been tried on a small scale have also been successful.
If we can successfully revive our fishing fleets it would not only provide a lot of employment in fishing, but also bring increased prosperity to many harbour towns.
The U.K. would almost certainly be much better off without full membership of the European Union. However immediate total withdrawal would cause too many problems. Piecemeal withdrawal by opting out of one area at a time would more practical.
We would no doubt be told by Brussels that we may not. However the Queen in Parliament has the power to repeal legislation and if necessary abrogate treaties.
As a start we should opt out of the the common fisheries policy that has all but destroyed the British fishing industry, and caused huge losses of fish stocks. We should follow the example of Iceland, among others, to claim maximum territorial waters reserved for our fishermen. We need to set up large fishing free zones to allow stocks to recover and spread out from them. Other nations have tried this and it works. The few areas in U.K. waters where this has been tried on a small scale have also been successful.
If we can successfully revive our fishing fleets it would not only provide a lot of employment in fishing, but also bring increased prosperity to many harbour towns.
I agree with David Cameron that Turkey should be acknowledged within the EU. Why then is the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus not also acknowledged.
I agree with David Cameron that Turkey should be acknowledged within the EU. Why then is the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus not also acknowledged.
Foreigners, including people from the EU, must have health insurance. If they arrive with out it they must be required to purchase it at the place of entry. No insurance, no entry. It would save the NHS millions. They have started to do this in Cuba. So should we.
Foreigners, including people from the EU, must have health insurance. If they arrive with out it they must be required to purchase it at the place of entry. No insurance, no entry. It would save the NHS millions. They have started to do this in Cuba. So should we.
Far from the Prime Minister supporting the Turkish application to join the EU, we should, along with the rest of Europe be blocking them at all costs.
Far from the Prime Minister supporting the Turkish application to join the EU, we should, along with the rest of Europe be blocking them at all costs.
Scrap, or better still don't allow in the first place, the EU to increase its' draconian policing powers by means of the European Investigation Order.
Scrap, or better still don't allow in the first place, the EU to increase its' draconian policing powers by means of the European Investigation Order.
At the moment we appear to be locked forever into the EU no matter what happens.
If the Government is really intent on putting power back into the hands of the people, there has to be some way of repealing all laws and treaties made in our name and this includes our membership or the way we are part of the EU.
Once every generation, say every 25 years there should be two referendum, 1 concerning our ongoing membership of the EU and one concerning our relationship with the EU.
This should actually be available to all EU countries and would certainly make the EU more accountable to the population.
It is most certainly a fact that no one who voted at the last referendum on our membership of the EU voted for it becoming an ever greater controling part of our everyday life.
I personally would not wish Great Britain to leave the EU, however I wish to be ap art of it but most certainly not controlled by it.
At the moment we appear to be locked forever into the EU no matter what happens.
If the Government is really intent on putting power back into the hands of the people, there has to be some way of repealing all laws and treaties made in our name and this includes our membership or the way we are part of the EU.
Once every generation, say every 25 years there should be two referendum, 1 concerning our ongoing membership of the EU and one concerning our relationship with the EU.
This should actually be available to all EU countries and would certainly make the EU more accountable to the population.
It is most certainly a fact that no one who voted at the last referendum on our membership of the EU voted for it becoming an ever greater controling part of our everyday life.
I personally would not wish Great Britain to leave the EU, however I wish to be ap art of it but most certainly not controlled by it.
Theresa May on behalf of all UK citizens and Her Majesty's Government (HMG) should not sign up to the European Investigation Order(EIO) and she should opt out of the EIO.
Theresa May on behalf of all UK citizens and Her Majesty's Government (HMG) should not sign up to the European Investigation Order(EIO) and she should opt out of the EIO.
For both the European Investigation Order (EIO) and the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) laws to be blocked from coming into force or repealed. Both are highly damaging to our Civil Liberties and Freedoms as a Nation. European police forces will be/are able to undermine our own when it comes to investigating cases.
For both the European Investigation Order (EIO) and the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) laws to be blocked from coming into force or repealed. Both are highly damaging to our Civil Liberties and Freedoms as a Nation. European police forces will be/are able to undermine our own when it comes to investigating cases.
We do not have to be members of the EU in order to trade with or European partners or to co-operate fully with them on cross-border issues such as crime or terrorism.
BUT an organisation set up to foster trade links has become a greedy monster with a massive ego, a creature which repeatedly ignores the democratic will of the people it exists to 'serve'. It is unable to take "No" for an answer and routinely interferes in aspects of everyday life that are way outside its remit. It has been proven to be corrupt to the core, yet 'we' give it £45m a day (!!) to waste on its pet projects. We can no longer afford to be so profligate
I am NOT a citizen of a European superstate; I am BRITISH and I intend to remain so
We do not have to be members of the EU in order to trade with or European partners or to co-operate fully with them on cross-border issues such as crime or terrorism.
BUT an organisation set up to foster trade links has become a greedy monster with a massive ego, a creature which repeatedly ignores the democratic will of the people it exists to 'serve'. It is unable to take "No" for an answer and routinely interferes in aspects of everyday life that are way outside its remit. It has been proven to be corrupt to the core, yet 'we' give it £45m a day (!!) to waste on its pet projects. We can no longer afford to be so profligate
I am NOT a citizen of a European superstate; I am BRITISH and I intend to remain so
The UK's net contribution to the EU budget – ie the amount we pay in that is above and beyond what we get back in EU grants – is going up.
Over 2007-9 it was in the order of £4.7 billion. That's now rising over 2010-3 to between £6-6.8 billion. That's according to recent official Government statistics.
The principle reason for this change is the 2008 Act of Parliament that put into force the deal Tony Blair reached with other EU leaders.
The extra £2 billion a year to Brussels was the price British taxpayers were supposed to pay in return for massive reform of the disastrous Common Agricultural Policy. But the promises made by the French and others have not been kept.
If you paid for something by mail order and it never got sent, you'd demand a refund.
Given the huge budget cuts that the UK is now facing, we should get this money back.
The UK's net contribution to the EU budget – ie the amount we pay in that is above and beyond what we get back in EU grants – is going up.
Over 2007-9 it was in the order of £4.7 billion. That's now rising over 2010-3 to between £6-6.8 billion. That's according to recent official Government statistics.
The principle reason for this change is the 2008 Act of Parliament that put into force the deal Tony Blair reached with other EU leaders.
The extra £2 billion a year to Brussels was the price British taxpayers were supposed to pay in return for massive reform of the disastrous Common Agricultural Policy. But the promises made by the French and others have not been kept.
If you paid for something by mail order and it never got sent, you'd demand a refund.
Given the huge budget cuts that the UK is now facing, we should get this money back.
The EU law outlawing 800 traditional vegetable varieties should be repealed to ensure these varieties do not become extinct.
The EU should not have the power to decide what the British people, or any people, can and cannot eat and grow.
Quotes:
'800 traditional vegetable varieties once grown in Britain are now outlawed by European legislation' – http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/07/outlawed_seeds.php
'In the past 100 years, 90 percent of UK's vegetable varieties have been lost, with the same happening in much of the industrialized world'. – http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/07/outlawed_seeds.php
'Farmers and growers no longer have the automatic right to save seed of varieties covered by plant breeders' rights (
Why is it important that we continue to grow the traditional varieties of vegetables? Heritage, or heirloom, vegetables are important because they contain a wealth of genetic material which could be of vital importance in the future. They should not be discarded and replaced with modern varieties, simply because the latter appear to have more useful characteristics at the moment. Indeed it would be extremely risky and unwise to do this, because nobody knows exactly what the future has in store for us! No one can predict with any great certainty exactly which genetic characteristics will be of importance in 50 or more years time. Nor can anyone know which pests and diseases will be around then, or what the climate will be like. It is, therefore, vitally important that we maintain genetic diversity by preserving as many different species of plants as possible. For it is only by doing this, that we can ensure that we have the best possible chance of successfully adapting to future conditions – whatever they may be.' – http://www.btinternet.com/~bury_rd/heritage.htm
The EU law outlawing 800 traditional vegetable varieties should be repealed to ensure these varieties do not become extinct.
The EU should not have the power to decide what the British people, or any people, can and cannot eat and grow.
Quotes:
'800 traditional vegetable varieties once grown in Britain are now outlawed by European legislation' – http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/07/outlawed_seeds.php
'In the past 100 years, 90 percent of UK's vegetable varieties have been lost, with the same happening in much of the industrialized world'. – http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/07/outlawed_seeds.php
'Farmers and growers no longer have the automatic right to save seed of varieties covered by plant breeders' rights (
Why is it important that we continue to grow the traditional varieties of vegetables? Heritage, or heirloom, vegetables are important because they contain a wealth of genetic material which could be of vital importance in the future. They should not be discarded and replaced with modern varieties, simply because the latter appear to have more useful characteristics at the moment. Indeed it would be extremely risky and unwise to do this, because nobody knows exactly what the future has in store for us! No one can predict with any great certainty exactly which genetic characteristics will be of importance in 50 or more years time. Nor can anyone know which pests and diseases will be around then, or what the climate will be like. It is, therefore, vitally important that we maintain genetic diversity by preserving as many different species of plants as possible. For it is only by doing this, that we can ensure that we have the best possible chance of successfully adapting to future conditions – whatever they may be.' – http://www.btinternet.com/~bury_rd/heritage.htm
As long as the EU remains unelected by british citizens and a referendum denied then any law forced upon us by the EU becomes an infringement upon our liberties. Whether or not you are pro or anti Europe is irrelevant, the fact is democracy has been denied and as long as we are denied a vote or a chance to elect the EU officials then any rule forced upon us is an act of dictatorship and oppression.
As long as the EU remains unelected by british citizens and a referendum denied then any law forced upon us by the EU becomes an infringement upon our liberties. Whether or not you are pro or anti Europe is irrelevant, the fact is democracy has been denied and as long as we are denied a vote or a chance to elect the EU officials then any rule forced upon us is an act of dictatorship and oppression.
I want the European Union to withdraw its claim, on any individual, to be a citizen of the EU whenever an individual requires this.
I want the European Union to withdraw its claim, on any individual, to be a citizen of the EU whenever an individual requires this.
English Bill Of Rights 1689
Quote
‘’And I do declare That noe forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realme Soe helpe me God.’’
ENGLISH ASSERTION OF OUR FREEBORN RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES
We the English assert our freeborn right to live without fear or threat from the government, state and foreign powers. And we recognise no oppressive laws nor foreign laws only Just laws made by and for the people in accordance with our English Declaration of Rights and its statutory form, the English Bill of rights. We are aware of, understand and acknowledge, that English common law has primacy.
And declare our nations right to govern itself and defend our ancient and indubitable rights and liberties against internal and external powers.
It is the duty and responsibility of parliament to protect these rights, liberties and the interests of the people both now and in the future, and not in anyway infringe, remove or be prejudiced against them. To do so is a breach of the Bill of Rights and unlawful.
The Bill of Rights states that the crown, both houses of parliament and the people are parts of a single entity, and abolition of the structure and responsibility of crown and parliament in part or whole is illegal. As the Declaration of Rights 1688 and Magna Carta 1215 declare our freedoms to be self-evident that exist by right and are permanent.
We assert that the crown servants and members of the judiciary do swear and continue to swear Oaths of Allegiance to this nation and will serve our people according to our laws and customs and will be faithful to these oaths in law, action and allegiance. -And that members of our Armed Forces do likewise and continue to swear allegiance to our nation. And that crown servants members of the judiciary and the armed forces do not and shall never swear oaths of allegiance nor any other oath to parliament or other powers. And that parliament does not interfere with the duties and relationships of these oaths, as parliament has no lawful right to do so, nor shall and must never have.
The Privy Counsillors shall always swear allegiance to this nation; and will assist and defend all jurisdictions, pre-eminences, and authorities granted and annexed to the crown by Acts of Parliament or otherwise, against all foreign princes, persons, prelates, states and potentates. And generally in all things do swear to be a faithful and true servant and do as they ought to do.
-Any person who breaches these oaths must be removed immediately and must never again hold office or be of service to the rule and government of this nation in any form.
Such a breach of oath is the swearing of an oath on appointment as a European Union Commissioner as committed by some of this nations privy counsillors. All those that have done this have broken their oath of allegiance to this nation and do serve foreign interest and powers. They must be removed from office.
Our eternal freedoms, rights and liberties and the right to govern ourselves are enshrined in the English Bill of Rights, they are permanent and for all time. Any acts that attack these are treason and the perpetrators of such acts must be tried for treason.
We recognise that the signing of the treaties below:
The six treaties:
1. The European Communities Act 1972.
2. The Single European Act, 1986.
3. The Maastricht Treaty, 1992.
4. The Amsterdam Treaty, 1997.
5. The Nice Treaty 2001.
6. The Lisbon Treaty 2008. (Previously called the Reform Treaty)
-Are such acts, and that parliament failed and neglected its duty as established for all time in the Bill of Rights. And that this was and is a crime against the people. This breach and betrayal of our English rights and liberties as enshrined and protected within the Bill of Rights marks the assault, erosion and loss of our independence and identity, and the moment that our nation ceased to be ruled by an elected government. Where the ability for self-rule and to make and live by our laws has been temporally lost. So today foreign laws that are made overseas by the unelected power called the European Union are used to oppress us. And this organisation called European Union now ‘claims’ jurisdiction over us.
This oppression by a foreign power and the continuing collaboration of our members of parliament is both an attack on our native freedoms, rights, liberties and identity and an act of treason against this nation and shall be lawfully treated as such.
We demand that those responsible for these acts of treason and neglect should be tried under our still legally binding law: MISPRISION OF TREASON.
Misprision of Treason is an offence or misdemeanor akin to treason or felony. It is the neglect of duty by a public official who conceals a knowledge of treasonable actions or designs. At an assize it may warrant the same penalty as High Treason. A subject of the Crown is also bound to inform the magistrates if he knows that High Treason is being contemplated.
When signing the Six Treaties the then governments knew they were breaking our laws and compromised parliaments integrity and duty as enshrined in the Bill of Rights. This betrayal is responsible for all subsequent attacks and assaults against our nation. As these acts are unlawful we demand their immediate repeal and shall never recognise foreign rule nor oppression and will stand firm and resolute until our people win back all that has been taken from them.
We assert our right, as set out in our English Bill of Rights, to petition the Monarch/Crown (referendum) on the matter of being ruled from overseas and by foreign power. This right to petition the Monarch having been denied us by successive Prime Ministers (The Monarchs/Crowns Administrator)
English Bill Of Rights 1689
Quote
‘’And I do declare That noe forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realme Soe helpe me God.’’
ENGLISH ASSERTION OF OUR FREEBORN RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES
We the English assert our freeborn right to live without fear or threat from the government, state and foreign powers. And we recognise no oppressive laws nor foreign laws only Just laws made by and for the people in accordance with our English Declaration of Rights and its statutory form, the English Bill of rights. We are aware of, understand and acknowledge, that English common law has primacy.
And declare our nations right to govern itself and defend our ancient and indubitable rights and liberties against internal and external powers.
It is the duty and responsibility of parliament to protect these rights, liberties and the interests of the people both now and in the future, and not in anyway infringe, remove or be prejudiced against them. To do so is a breach of the Bill of Rights and unlawful.
The Bill of Rights states that the crown, both houses of parliament and the people are parts of a single entity, and abolition of the structure and responsibility of crown and parliament in part or whole is illegal. As the Declaration of Rights 1688 and Magna Carta 1215 declare our freedoms to be self-evident that exist by right and are permanent.
We assert that the crown servants and members of the judiciary do swear and continue to swear Oaths of Allegiance to this nation and will serve our people according to our laws and customs and will be faithful to these oaths in law, action and allegiance. -And that members of our Armed Forces do likewise and continue to swear allegiance to our nation. And that crown servants members of the judiciary and the armed forces do not and shall never swear oaths of allegiance nor any other oath to parliament or other powers. And that parliament does not interfere with the duties and relationships of these oaths, as parliament has no lawful right to do so, nor shall and must never have.
The Privy Counsillors shall always swear allegiance to this nation; and will assist and defend all jurisdictions, pre-eminences, and authorities granted and annexed to the crown by Acts of Parliament or otherwise, against all foreign princes, persons, prelates, states and potentates. And generally in all things do swear to be a faithful and true servant and do as they ought to do.
-Any person who breaches these oaths must be removed immediately and must never again hold office or be of service to the rule and government of this nation in any form.
Such a breach of oath is the swearing of an oath on appointment as a European Union Commissioner as committed by some of this nations privy counsillors. All those that have done this have broken their oath of allegiance to this nation and do serve foreign interest and powers. They must be removed from office.
Our eternal freedoms, rights and liberties and the right to govern ourselves are enshrined in the English Bill of Rights, they are permanent and for all time. Any acts that attack these are treason and the perpetrators of such acts must be tried for treason.
We recognise that the signing of the treaties below:
The six treaties:
1. The European Communities Act 1972.
2. The Single European Act, 1986.
3. The Maastricht Treaty, 1992.
4. The Amsterdam Treaty, 1997.
5. The Nice Treaty 2001.
6. The Lisbon Treaty 2008. (Previously called the Reform Treaty)
-Are such acts, and that parliament failed and neglected its duty as established for all time in the Bill of Rights. And that this was and is a crime against the people. This breach and betrayal of our English rights and liberties as enshrined and protected within the Bill of Rights marks the assault, erosion and loss of our independence and identity, and the moment that our nation ceased to be ruled by an elected government. Where the ability for self-rule and to make and live by our laws has been temporally lost. So today foreign laws that are made overseas by the unelected power called the European Union are used to oppress us. And this organisation called European Union now ‘claims’ jurisdiction over us.
This oppression by a foreign power and the continuing collaboration of our members of parliament is both an attack on our native freedoms, rights, liberties and identity and an act of treason against this nation and shall be lawfully treated as such.
We demand that those responsible for these acts of treason and neglect should be tried under our still legally binding law: MISPRISION OF TREASON.
Misprision of Treason is an offence or misdemeanor akin to treason or felony. It is the neglect of duty by a public official who conceals a knowledge of treasonable actions or designs. At an assize it may warrant the same penalty as High Treason. A subject of the Crown is also bound to inform the magistrates if he knows that High Treason is being contemplated.
When signing the Six Treaties the then governments knew they were breaking our laws and compromised parliaments integrity and duty as enshrined in the Bill of Rights. This betrayal is responsible for all subsequent attacks and assaults against our nation. As these acts are unlawful we demand their immediate repeal and shall never recognise foreign rule nor oppression and will stand firm and resolute until our people win back all that has been taken from them.
We assert our right, as set out in our English Bill of Rights, to petition the Monarch/Crown (referendum) on the matter of being ruled from overseas and by foreign power. This right to petition the Monarch having been denied us by successive Prime Ministers (The Monarchs/Crowns Administrator)
English Bill Of Rights 1689
Quote
‘’And I do declare That noe forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realme Soe helpe me God.’’
ENGLISH ASSERTION OF OUR FREEBORN RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES
We the English assert our freeborn right to live without fear or threat from the government, state and foreign powers. And we recognise no oppressive laws nor foreign laws only Just laws made by and for the people in accordance with our English Declaration of Rights and its statutory form, the English Bill of rights. We are aware of, understand and acknowledge, that English common law has primacy.
And declare our nations right to govern itself and defend our ancient and indubitable rights and liberties against internal and external powers.
It is the duty and responsibility of parliament to protect these rights, liberties and the interests of the people both now and in the future, and not in anyway infringe, remove or be prejudiced against them. To do so is a breach of the Bill of Rights and unlawful.
The Bill of Rights states that the crown, both houses of parliament and the people are parts of a single entity, and abolition of the structure and responsibility of crown and parliament in part or whole is illegal. As the Declaration of Rights 1688 and Magna Carta 1215 declare our freedoms to be self-evident that exist by right and are permanent.
We assert that the crown servants and members of the judiciary do swear and continue to swear Oaths of Allegiance to this nation and will serve our people according to our laws and customs and will be faithful to these oaths in law, action and allegiance. -And that members of our Armed Forces do likewise and continue to swear allegiance to our nation. And that crown servants members of the judiciary and the armed forces do not and shall never swear oaths of allegiance nor any other oath to parliament or other powers. And that parliament does not interfere with the duties and relationships of these oaths, as parliament has no lawful right to do so, nor shall and must never have.
The Privy Counsillors shall always swear allegiance to this nation; and will assist and defend all jurisdictions, pre-eminences, and authorities granted and annexed to the crown by Acts of Parliament or otherwise, against all foreign princes, persons, prelates, states and potentates. And generally in all things do swear to be a faithful and true servant and do as they ought to do.
-Any person who breaches these oaths must be removed immediately and must never again hold office or be of service to the rule and government of this nation in any form.
Such a breach of oath is the swearing of an oath on appointment as a European Union Commissioner as committed by some of this nations privy counsillors. All those that have done this have broken their oath of allegiance to this nation and do serve foreign interest and powers. They must be removed from office.
Our eternal freedoms, rights and liberties and the right to govern ourselves are enshrined in the English Bill of Rights, they are permanent and for all time. Any acts that attack these are treason and the perpetrators of such acts must be tried for treason.
We recognise that the signing of the treaties below:
The six treaties:
1. The European Communities Act 1972.
2. The Single European Act, 1986.
3. The Maastricht Treaty, 1992.
4. The Amsterdam Treaty, 1997.
5. The Nice Treaty 2001.
6. The Lisbon Treaty 2008. (Previously called the Reform Treaty)
-Are such acts, and that parliament failed and neglected its duty as established for all time in the Bill of Rights. And that this was and is a crime against the people. This breach and betrayal of our English rights and liberties as enshrined and protected within the Bill of Rights marks the assault, erosion and loss of our independence and identity, and the moment that our nation ceased to be ruled by an elected government. Where the ability for self-rule and to make and live by our laws has been temporally lost. So today foreign laws that are made overseas by the unelected power called the European Union are used to oppress us. And this organisation called European Union now ‘claims’ jurisdiction over us.
This oppression by a foreign power and the continuing collaboration of our members of parliament is both an attack on our native freedoms, rights, liberties and identity and an act of treason against this nation and shall be lawfully treated as such.
We demand that those responsible for these acts of treason and neglect should be tried under our still legally binding law: MISPRISION OF TREASON.
Misprision of Treason is an offence or misdemeanor akin to treason or felony. It is the neglect of duty by a public official who conceals a knowledge of treasonable actions or designs. At an assize it may warrant the same penalty as High Treason. A subject of the Crown is also bound to inform the magistrates if he knows that High Treason is being contemplated.
When signing the Six Treaties the then governments knew they were breaking our laws and compromised parliaments integrity and duty as enshrined in the Bill of Rights. This betrayal is responsible for all subsequent attacks and assaults against our nation. As these acts are unlawful we demand their immediate repeal and shall never recognise foreign rule nor oppression and will stand firm and resolute until our people win back all that has been taken from them.
We assert our right, as set out in our English Bill of Rights, to petition the Monarch/Crown (referendum) on the matter of being ruled from overseas and by foreign power. This right to petition the Monarch having been denied us by successive Prime Ministers (The Monarchs/Crowns Administrator)
English Bill Of Rights 1689
Quote
‘’And I do declare That noe forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realme Soe helpe me God.’’
ENGLISH ASSERTION OF OUR FREEBORN RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES
We the English assert our freeborn right to live without fear or threat from the government, state and foreign powers. And we recognise no oppressive laws nor foreign laws only Just laws made by and for the people in accordance with our English Declaration of Rights and its statutory form, the English Bill of rights. We are aware of, understand and acknowledge, that English common law has primacy.
And declare our nations right to govern itself and defend our ancient and indubitable rights and liberties against internal and external powers.
It is the duty and responsibility of parliament to protect these rights, liberties and the interests of the people both now and in the future, and not in anyway infringe, remove or be prejudiced against them. To do so is a breach of the Bill of Rights and unlawful.
The Bill of Rights states that the crown, both houses of parliament and the people are parts of a single entity, and abolition of the structure and responsibility of crown and parliament in part or whole is illegal. As the Declaration of Rights 1688 and Magna Carta 1215 declare our freedoms to be self-evident that exist by right and are permanent.
We assert that the crown servants and members of the judiciary do swear and continue to swear Oaths of Allegiance to this nation and will serve our people according to our laws and customs and will be faithful to these oaths in law, action and allegiance. -And that members of our Armed Forces do likewise and continue to swear allegiance to our nation. And that crown servants members of the judiciary and the armed forces do not and shall never swear oaths of allegiance nor any other oath to parliament or other powers. And that parliament does not interfere with the duties and relationships of these oaths, as parliament has no lawful right to do so, nor shall and must never have.
The Privy Counsillors shall always swear allegiance to this nation; and will assist and defend all jurisdictions, pre-eminences, and authorities granted and annexed to the crown by Acts of Parliament or otherwise, against all foreign princes, persons, prelates, states and potentates. And generally in all things do swear to be a faithful and true servant and do as they ought to do.
-Any person who breaches these oaths must be removed immediately and must never again hold office or be of service to the rule and government of this nation in any form.
Such a breach of oath is the swearing of an oath on appointment as a European Union Commissioner as committed by some of this nations privy counsillors. All those that have done this have broken their oath of allegiance to this nation and do serve foreign interest and powers. They must be removed from office.
Our eternal freedoms, rights and liberties and the right to govern ourselves are enshrined in the English Bill of Rights, they are permanent and for all time. Any acts that attack these are treason and the perpetrators of such acts must be tried for treason.
We recognise that the signing of the treaties below:
The six treaties:
1. The European Communities Act 1972.
2. The Single European Act, 1986.
3. The Maastricht Treaty, 1992.
4. The Amsterdam Treaty, 1997.
5. The Nice Treaty 2001.
6. The Lisbon Treaty 2008. (Previously called the Reform Treaty)
-Are such acts, and that parliament failed and neglected its duty as established for all time in the Bill of Rights. And that this was and is a crime against the people. This breach and betrayal of our English rights and liberties as enshrined and protected within the Bill of Rights marks the assault, erosion and loss of our independence and identity, and the moment that our nation ceased to be ruled by an elected government. Where the ability for self-rule and to make and live by our laws has been temporally lost. So today foreign laws that are made overseas by the unelected power called the European Union are used to oppress us. And this organisation called European Union now ‘claims’ jurisdiction over us.
This oppression by a foreign power and the continuing collaboration of our members of parliament is both an attack on our native freedoms, rights, liberties and identity and an act of treason against this nation and shall be lawfully treated as such.
We demand that those responsible for these acts of treason and neglect should be tried under our still legally binding law: MISPRISION OF TREASON.
Misprision of Treason is an offence or misdemeanor akin to treason or felony. It is the neglect of duty by a public official who conceals a knowledge of treasonable actions or designs. At an assize it may warrant the same penalty as High Treason. A subject of the Crown is also bound to inform the magistrates if he knows that High Treason is being contemplated.
When signing the Six Treaties the then governments knew they were breaking our laws and compromised parliaments integrity and duty as enshrined in the Bill of Rights. This betrayal is responsible for all subsequent attacks and assaults against our nation. As these acts are unlawful we demand their immediate repeal and shall never recognise foreign rule nor oppression and will stand firm and resolute until our people win back all that has been taken from them.
We assert our right, as set out in our English Bill of Rights, to petition the Monarch/Crown (referendum) on the matter of being ruled from overseas and by foreign power. This right to petition the Monarch having been denied us by successive Prime Ministers (The Monarchs/Crowns Administrator)
English Bill Of Rights 1689
Quote
‘’And I do declare That noe forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realme Soe helpe me God.’’
ENGLISH ASSERTION OF OUR FREEBORN RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES
We the English assert our freeborn right to live without fear or threat from the government, state and foreign powers. And we recognise no oppressive laws nor foreign laws only Just laws made by and for the people in accordance with our English Declaration of Rights and its statutory form, the English Bill of rights. We are aware of, understand and acknowledge, that English common law has primacy.
And declare our nations right to govern itself and defend our ancient and indubitable rights and liberties against internal and external powers.
It is the duty and responsibility of parliament to protect these rights, liberties and the interests of the people both now and in the future, and not in anyway infringe, remove or be prejudiced against them. To do so is a breach of the Bill of Rights and unlawful.
The Bill of Rights states that the crown, both houses of parliament and the people are parts of a single entity, and abolition of the structure and responsibility of crown and parliament in part or whole is illegal. As the Declaration of Rights 1688 and Magna Carta 1215 declare our freedoms to be self-evident that exist by right and are permanent.
We assert that the crown servants and members of the judiciary do swear and continue to swear Oaths of Allegiance to this nation and will serve our people according to our laws and customs and will be faithful to these oaths in law, action and allegiance. -And that members of our Armed Forces do likewise and continue to swear allegiance to our nation. And that crown servants members of the judiciary and the armed forces do not and shall never swear oaths of allegiance nor any other oath to parliament or other powers. And that parliament does not interfere with the duties and relationships of these oaths, as parliament has no lawful right to do so, nor shall and must never have.
The Privy Counsillors shall always swear allegiance to this nation; and will assist and defend all jurisdictions, pre-eminences, and authorities granted and annexed to the crown by Acts of Parliament or otherwise, against all foreign princes, persons, prelates, states and potentates. And generally in all things do swear to be a faithful and true servant and do as they ought to do.
-Any person who breaches these oaths must be removed immediately and must never again hold office or be of service to the rule and government of this nation in any form.
Such a breach of oath is the swearing of an oath on appointment as a European Union Commissioner as committed by some of this nations privy counsillors. All those that have done this have broken their oath of allegiance to this nation and do serve foreign interest and powers. They must be removed from office.
Our eternal freedoms, rights and liberties and the right to govern ourselves are enshrined in the English Bill of Rights, they are permanent and for all time. Any acts that attack these are treason and the perpetrators of such acts must be tried for treason.
We recognise that the signing of the treaties below:
The six treaties:
1. The European Communities Act 1972.
2. The Single European Act, 1986.
3. The Maastricht Treaty, 1992.
4. The Amsterdam Treaty, 1997.
5. The Nice Treaty 2001.
6. The Lisbon Treaty 2008. (Previously called the Reform Treaty)
-Are such acts, and that parliament failed and neglected its duty as established for all time in the Bill of Rights. And that this was and is a crime against the people. This breach and betrayal of our English rights and liberties as enshrined and protected within the Bill of Rights marks the assault, erosion and loss of our independence and identity, and the moment that our nation ceased to be ruled by an elected government. Where the ability for self-rule and to make and live by our laws has been temporally lost. So today foreign laws that are made overseas by the unelected power called the European Union are used to oppress us. And this organisation called European Union now ‘claims’ jurisdiction over us.
This oppression by a foreign power and the continuing collaboration of our members of parliament is both an attack on our native freedoms, rights, liberties and identity and an act of treason against this nation and shall be lawfully treated as such.
We demand that those responsible for these acts of treason and neglect should be tried under our still legally binding law: MISPRISION OF TREASON.
Misprision of Treason is an offence or misdemeanor akin to treason or felony. It is the neglect of duty by a public official who conceals a knowledge of treasonable actions or designs. At an assize it may warrant the same penalty as High Treason. A subject of the Crown is also bound to inform the magistrates if he knows that High Treason is being contemplated.
When signing the Six Treaties the then governments knew they were breaking our laws and compromised parliaments integrity and duty as enshrined in the Bill of Rights. This betrayal is responsible for all subsequent attacks and assaults against our nation. As these acts are unlawful we demand their immediate repeal and shall never recognise foreign rule nor oppression and will stand firm and resolute until our people win back all that has been taken from them.
We assert our right, as set out in our English Bill of Rights, to petition the Monarch/Crown (referendum) on the matter of being ruled from overseas and by foreign power. This right to petition the Monarch having been denied us by successive Prime Ministers (The Monarchs/Crowns Administrator)
English Bill Of Rights 1689
Quote
‘’And I do declare That noe forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realme Soe helpe me God.’’
ENGLISH ASSERTION OF OUR FREEBORN RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES
We the English assert our freeborn right to live without fear or threat from the government, state and foreign powers. And we recognise no oppressive laws nor foreign laws only Just laws made by and for the people in accordance with our English Declaration of Rights and its statutory form, the English Bill of rights. We are aware of, understand and acknowledge, that English common law has primacy.
And declare our nations right to govern itself and defend our ancient and indubitable rights and liberties against internal and external powers.
It is the duty and responsibility of parliament to protect these rights, liberties and the interests of the people both now and in the future, and not in anyway infringe, remove or be prejudiced against them. To do so is a breach of the Bill of Rights and unlawful.
The Bill of Rights states that the crown, both houses of parliament and the people are parts of a single entity, and abolition of the structure and responsibility of crown and parliament in part or whole is illegal. As the Declaration of Rights 1688 and Magna Carta 1215 declare our freedoms to be self-evident that exist by right and are permanent.
We assert that the crown servants and members of the judiciary do swear and continue to swear Oaths of Allegiance to this nation and will serve our people according to our laws and customs and will be faithful to these oaths in law, action and allegiance. -And that members of our Armed Forces do likewise and continue to swear allegiance to our nation. And that crown servants members of the judiciary and the armed forces do not and shall never swear oaths of allegiance nor any other oath to parliament or other powers. And that parliament does not interfere with the duties and relationships of these oaths, as parliament has no lawful right to do so, nor shall and must never have.
The Privy Counsillors shall always swear allegiance to this nation; and will assist and defend all jurisdictions, pre-eminences, and authorities granted and annexed to the crown by Acts of Parliament or otherwise, against all foreign princes, persons, prelates, states and potentates. And generally in all things do swear to be a faithful and true servant and do as they ought to do.
-Any person who breaches these oaths must be removed immediately and must never again hold office or be of service to the rule and government of this nation in any form.
Such a breach of oath is the swearing of an oath on appointment as a European Union Commissioner as committed by some of this nations privy counsillors. All those that have done this have broken their oath of allegiance to this nation and do serve foreign interest and powers. They must be removed from office.
Our eternal freedoms, rights and liberties and the right to govern ourselves are enshrined in the English Bill of Rights, they are permanent and for all time. Any acts that attack these are treason and the perpetrators of such acts must be tried for treason.
We recognise that the signing of the treaties below:
The six treaties:
1. The European Communities Act 1972.
2. The Single European Act, 1986.
3. The Maastricht Treaty, 1992.
4. The Amsterdam Treaty, 1997.
5. The Nice Treaty 2001.
6. The Lisbon Treaty 2008. (Previously called the Reform Treaty)
-Are such acts, and that parliament failed and neglected its duty as established for all time in the Bill of Rights. And that this was and is a crime against the people. This breach and betrayal of our English rights and liberties as enshrined and protected within the Bill of Rights marks the assault, erosion and loss of our independence and identity, and the moment that our nation ceased to be ruled by an elected government. Where the ability for self-rule and to make and live by our laws has been temporally lost. So today foreign laws that are made overseas by the unelected power called the European Union are used to oppress us. And this organisation called European Union now ‘claims’ jurisdiction over us.
This oppression by a foreign power and the continuing collaboration of our members of parliament is both an attack on our native freedoms, rights, liberties and identity and an act of treason against this nation and shall be lawfully treated as such.
We demand that those responsible for these acts of treason and neglect should be tried under our still legally binding law: MISPRISION OF TREASON.
Misprision of Treason is an offence or misdemeanor akin to treason or felony. It is the neglect of duty by a public official who conceals a knowledge of treasonable actions or designs. At an assize it may warrant the same penalty as High Treason. A subject of the Crown is also bound to inform the magistrates if he knows that High Treason is being contemplated.
When signing the Six Treaties the then governments knew they were breaking our laws and compromised parliaments integrity and duty as enshrined in the Bill of Rights. This betrayal is responsible for all subsequent attacks and assaults against our nation. As these acts are unlawful we demand their immediate repeal and shall never recognise foreign rule nor oppression and will stand firm and resolute until our people win back all that has been taken from them.
We assert our right, as set out in our English Bill of Rights, to petition the Monarch/Crown (referendum) on the matter of being ruled from overseas and by foreign power. This right to petition the Monarch having been denied us by successive Prime Ministers (The Monarchs/Crowns Administrator)
Put all EU laws that are not to do with a single trade zone up for referendum in detail. The referendum in the early 70's did not ask people to vote on social, political or military integration, only trade. There is therefore no mandate for anything else.
Put all EU laws that are not to do with a single trade zone up for referendum in detail. The referendum in the early 70's did not ask people to vote on social, political or military integration, only trade. There is therefore no mandate for anything else.
For years now the French have had a sensible and practical approach to EU legislation and regulations: they take a long cool look, and decide: (a) if it makes sense, and (b) if it is good for France; if the answer to either of these is 'no' , they ignore the EU dictat, and continue to do things their own way.
Britain should do the same – NOT slavishly snap to attention and immediately observe the letter of every one of even the most half – baked pronouncements which emanate from Brussels and Maastricht.
For years now the French have had a sensible and practical approach to EU legislation and regulations: they take a long cool look, and decide: (a) if it makes sense, and (b) if it is good for France; if the answer to either of these is 'no' , they ignore the EU dictat, and continue to do things their own way.
Britain should do the same – NOT slavishly snap to attention and immediately observe the letter of every one of even the most half – baked pronouncements which emanate from Brussels and Maastricht.
It is very clear that the vast majority of the British population would now be in favour of a withdrawal from Europe. The original concept of a Trading Community has developed in to a situation where every facet of British life from economic, political, social is being dramatically adversely affected by Europeans outside of the U.K wishing to be fully in control of an integrated Europe. This is far, far beyond the initial intention and well beyond the intentions and vision of the British people at the time of the Referendum. They voted for "economic co-operation."
We as a nation cannot afford (and should not support) the economic, political and social instability of so much of Europe and the clear intention of Germany and France to dominate.
We can prosper without the weight of those countries around our neck and without doubt the advantages will far outweigh the disadvantages as we return to true British standards.
It is very clear that the vast majority of the British population would now be in favour of a withdrawal from Europe. The original concept of a Trading Community has developed in to a situation where every facet of British life from economic, political, social is being dramatically adversely affected by Europeans outside of the U.K wishing to be fully in control of an integrated Europe. This is far, far beyond the initial intention and well beyond the intentions and vision of the British people at the time of the Referendum. They voted for "economic co-operation."
We as a nation cannot afford (and should not support) the economic, political and social instability of so much of Europe and the clear intention of Germany and France to dominate.
We can prosper without the weight of those countries around our neck and without doubt the advantages will far outweigh the disadvantages as we return to true British standards.