Stop the Government Stealing ‘Adoptable’ Children

Children should remain with their parents until factual evidence (not hearsay) has been tested in a closed Court with media attendance and a full Jury.

Children should never be removed from their parents for 'risk of emotional harm'. When children are removed from their parents they always experience emotional harm by the removal.

The 'balance of probability' test is against the parent's human rights of a fair trial and should be changed to 'beyond reasonable doubt'.

No child should be taken away from their parent without full assessment. Where the local authority have significant concerns but have not proved their case with factual evidence, beyond reasonable doubt by Jury, the Judge should order a residential assessment of the family in an Independent Family Assessment Centre which the family must attend BEFORE removal of the child from the parent.

No member of the court advisory service, particularly the legal guardians who advise the court on the best interests of the child should have any form of direct or indirect interest in any kind of adoption agency.

If the Independent family assessment centre substantiates the concerns of the local authority, with testable evidence such as CCTV, within a 3 month period the evidence should be presented to the Court during an application to remove the children from the parents.

If the Jury in the application decide that the threshold of 'actual significant harm is proved beyond reasonble doubt' using the evidence of the Independent Family Assessment Centre a care order should be made, otherwise the case should be closed.

While the family attend the Independent Family Assessment Centre any kinship assessment should be carried out on friends and family to be alternative carers for the children, should the local authority achieve a care order. The family should be allowed to remain at the Family Assessment centre until the kinship assessments are complete.

Parents should be given the opportunity to allow themselves to be properly investigated for a maximum period of 3 months under a Supervision Order. During that period the child should remain with the parents. At the end of the 3 month period the Local Authority, if they still have concerns, should apply to the Court for an order for a 3 month Independent Residential Family Assessment, for a further 28 day Supervision Order.

EVERY application made in family proceedings should be made to a closed court with media attendance, a full Jury and 'proved beyond reasonable doubt'.

A Supervision Order should be granted if there is a proved RISK of harm.

A Care Order should be granted if there is proved harm.

If the Local Authority cannot prove Risk of harm or harm beyond reasonable doubt within a maximum of 12 months the case should be closed. If the Local Authority later, after closing a case, have further concerns regarding the safety of the children the closed files should be provided to the Court and Jury.

The local authority should work with the parent to overcome any concerns they have regarding the parent's care of the children. This should include funding for counselling, drug and alcohol rehabilitation, family assisstance, education, protection from domestic violence.

Interim Care Orders should be abolished.

No child should be adopted without the explicit consent of the parent.

Every foster carer should be in a position to offer long term fostering. Everytime a child needs to change foster carer/placement an opportunity should be given to the parent to prove thier circumstances have changed and they should be given a further opportunity of a 3 month Independent Residential Family Assessment.

A parent should be given the opportunity to make an application to end a Care Order as frequently as they wish. At each hearing the Local Authority will need to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the circumstances that caused the child harm have not significantly changed. If they fail to prove beyond reasonable doubt, to a Jurty the Court should Order a Supervision Order for a maximum of 3 months or a further 3 month Residential Family Assessment, or the case should be closed.

While it is necessary to protect the safety of children, it is also necessary to protect the sanctity of the family. It is necessary to protect the Human Rights of the children and parents. Current Child proceedings strip families of all their Human Rights. The secrecy of the Family Justice System breeds corruption. The unaccountablity of the Local Authority leads to abuses of power.

The public do not have any faith in government services nor the goverment to protect them in a moral and just society. The current proceedings warn people not to engage with government services due to the risk of having their children taken away. Mothers are giving birth alone through fear of having their babies taken at the hospital, families are living a life on the run as they are scared of being found and having their children taken from them, partners are suffering abusive relationships because they are scared the social services will take their children if they call anyone for help. Parents are not taking their children to the doctor because they are scared they will be accused of the injury to the child and their child will be removed. Parents are not seeking counselling or rehabilitation from addictions or assistance in a crisis.

The overwhelming message to parents due to the current care proceedings and social services procedures is AVOID ALL GOVERNMENT SERVICES AS THEY WILL STEAL YOUR CHILDREN.

The public are then learning about the child sexual abuse which seems to be rife amoungst those in positions of power. We learn about Operation Middleton, Operation Ore, Holly Grieg, Child Abuse in the Catholic Church, Haut de la Garenne, Operation Lentisk, Commission to Enquire into Child Abuse, The Waterhouse Report amongst many of the other horrifying reports and we come to the conclusion that our children are being stolen unlawfully and illegally for sinister reasons.

Through child stealing by the government and paedophiles in power the public are losing faith and trust in their government. The people are learning about secret societies, the New World Order, satanic ritual and lawful rebellion. We do not wish to be ruled by satan worshipping elite. We wish to live in a moral and just society. God save our queen!

Why is this idea important?

Children should remain with their parents until factual evidence (not hearsay) has been tested in a closed Court with media attendance and a full Jury.

Children should never be removed from their parents for 'risk of emotional harm'. When children are removed from their parents they always experience emotional harm by the removal.

The 'balance of probability' test is against the parent's human rights of a fair trial and should be changed to 'beyond reasonable doubt'.

No child should be taken away from their parent without full assessment. Where the local authority have significant concerns but have not proved their case with factual evidence, beyond reasonable doubt by Jury, the Judge should order a residential assessment of the family in an Independent Family Assessment Centre which the family must attend BEFORE removal of the child from the parent.

No member of the court advisory service, particularly the legal guardians who advise the court on the best interests of the child should have any form of direct or indirect interest in any kind of adoption agency.

If the Independent family assessment centre substantiates the concerns of the local authority, with testable evidence such as CCTV, within a 3 month period the evidence should be presented to the Court during an application to remove the children from the parents.

If the Jury in the application decide that the threshold of 'actual significant harm is proved beyond reasonble doubt' using the evidence of the Independent Family Assessment Centre a care order should be made, otherwise the case should be closed.

While the family attend the Independent Family Assessment Centre any kinship assessment should be carried out on friends and family to be alternative carers for the children, should the local authority achieve a care order. The family should be allowed to remain at the Family Assessment centre until the kinship assessments are complete.

Parents should be given the opportunity to allow themselves to be properly investigated for a maximum period of 3 months under a Supervision Order. During that period the child should remain with the parents. At the end of the 3 month period the Local Authority, if they still have concerns, should apply to the Court for an order for a 3 month Independent Residential Family Assessment, for a further 28 day Supervision Order.

EVERY application made in family proceedings should be made to a closed court with media attendance, a full Jury and 'proved beyond reasonable doubt'.

A Supervision Order should be granted if there is a proved RISK of harm.

A Care Order should be granted if there is proved harm.

If the Local Authority cannot prove Risk of harm or harm beyond reasonable doubt within a maximum of 12 months the case should be closed. If the Local Authority later, after closing a case, have further concerns regarding the safety of the children the closed files should be provided to the Court and Jury.

The local authority should work with the parent to overcome any concerns they have regarding the parent's care of the children. This should include funding for counselling, drug and alcohol rehabilitation, family assisstance, education, protection from domestic violence.

Interim Care Orders should be abolished.

No child should be adopted without the explicit consent of the parent.

Every foster carer should be in a position to offer long term fostering. Everytime a child needs to change foster carer/placement an opportunity should be given to the parent to prove thier circumstances have changed and they should be given a further opportunity of a 3 month Independent Residential Family Assessment.

A parent should be given the opportunity to make an application to end a Care Order as frequently as they wish. At each hearing the Local Authority will need to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the circumstances that caused the child harm have not significantly changed. If they fail to prove beyond reasonable doubt, to a Jurty the Court should Order a Supervision Order for a maximum of 3 months or a further 3 month Residential Family Assessment, or the case should be closed.

While it is necessary to protect the safety of children, it is also necessary to protect the sanctity of the family. It is necessary to protect the Human Rights of the children and parents. Current Child proceedings strip families of all their Human Rights. The secrecy of the Family Justice System breeds corruption. The unaccountablity of the Local Authority leads to abuses of power.

The public do not have any faith in government services nor the goverment to protect them in a moral and just society. The current proceedings warn people not to engage with government services due to the risk of having their children taken away. Mothers are giving birth alone through fear of having their babies taken at the hospital, families are living a life on the run as they are scared of being found and having their children taken from them, partners are suffering abusive relationships because they are scared the social services will take their children if they call anyone for help. Parents are not taking their children to the doctor because they are scared they will be accused of the injury to the child and their child will be removed. Parents are not seeking counselling or rehabilitation from addictions or assistance in a crisis.

The overwhelming message to parents due to the current care proceedings and social services procedures is AVOID ALL GOVERNMENT SERVICES AS THEY WILL STEAL YOUR CHILDREN.

The public are then learning about the child sexual abuse which seems to be rife amoungst those in positions of power. We learn about Operation Middleton, Operation Ore, Holly Grieg, Child Abuse in the Catholic Church, Haut de la Garenne, Operation Lentisk, Commission to Enquire into Child Abuse, The Waterhouse Report amongst many of the other horrifying reports and we come to the conclusion that our children are being stolen unlawfully and illegally for sinister reasons.

Through child stealing by the government and paedophiles in power the public are losing faith and trust in their government. The people are learning about secret societies, the New World Order, satanic ritual and lawful rebellion. We do not wish to be ruled by satan worshipping elite. We wish to live in a moral and just society. God save our queen!

Common Sense

Restore the principal of common sense to the law and public sector.

Here i give two examples. My Aunt is a social worker. A foster family took on an autistic child. They wanted to go away for a few days and applied for £135 from social services to get a helper in to look after the child. My aunt and her manager had to go to the local head office where a comitee of 12 senior social workers met to approve the £135. If they had not the child would have beeng handed back to social services care at the cost of thousands. The jouney and meeting took all morning wasting valuable time for both my aunt and her manager. On top of that the cost of the 12 senior social workers would have all added up to far more than £135 _ it is ridiculous ! Common sense would be that my aunts manager would be able to make a judgement and sign off £135 pounds. The whole probably cost over £1000 once all the time was added up!

The second example is a colleague saw some kids looking through his letter box. He ran after them catching one. When he caught one the other turned round and started kicking him. He of course pushed the kid away with no damage inflicted. The kids mother called the police and the colleague got a caution and was told he should have done nothing by the police! Do we live in a crazy world!? Common sense would be that the kids would be cautioned for tresspasing and the mother given a wrap on the knuckles for being a poor mum and having no control of her children!

Why is this idea important?

Restore the principal of common sense to the law and public sector.

Here i give two examples. My Aunt is a social worker. A foster family took on an autistic child. They wanted to go away for a few days and applied for £135 from social services to get a helper in to look after the child. My aunt and her manager had to go to the local head office where a comitee of 12 senior social workers met to approve the £135. If they had not the child would have beeng handed back to social services care at the cost of thousands. The jouney and meeting took all morning wasting valuable time for both my aunt and her manager. On top of that the cost of the 12 senior social workers would have all added up to far more than £135 _ it is ridiculous ! Common sense would be that my aunts manager would be able to make a judgement and sign off £135 pounds. The whole probably cost over £1000 once all the time was added up!

The second example is a colleague saw some kids looking through his letter box. He ran after them catching one. When he caught one the other turned round and started kicking him. He of course pushed the kid away with no damage inflicted. The kids mother called the police and the colleague got a caution and was told he should have done nothing by the police! Do we live in a crazy world!? Common sense would be that the kids would be cautioned for tresspasing and the mother given a wrap on the knuckles for being a poor mum and having no control of her children!

Reform family courts and the conduct of social workers

Social workers in "child protection" are now reviled throughout the land as "childsnatchers" TAKING CHILDREN FROM PARENTS WHO HAVE NOT BEEN ACCUSED OR CONVICTED OF ANY CRIME WHATSOEVER ! Instead of "helpers" they are known as bullies who intimidate single mothers and whose main intent is meeting "adoption targets" not keeping families together . For ths image to change vital reforms are needed…….;
 
1:-Abolish the family court secrecy that gags parents who wish to complain.
2:-Abolish "emotional harm" and "risk" as justifications for putting children into care 
3:-Abolish "forced adoption"if a parent opposes an adoption in court
4:-Abolish decisions by family court judges to take babies and young children into care.(let juries decide) 
5:-Abolish the power of social services to regulate and control contact between parents and children , to censor their conversation or to restrict phone calls.The court must control the frequency of contacts.  
6:-Abolish the restriction preventing a lay advisor from presenting a case for parents refused legal aid
7:-Abolish hearsay evidence in family courts and require witnesses to stick to facts without "speculation."
8:-Abolish the removal of children for non life threatening forms of neglect such as absences from school or insanitary dwellings unless a written warning  has been served and the situation has not been remedied.
 
These reforms would stop most of the present injustices.

Why is this idea important?

Social workers in "child protection" are now reviled throughout the land as "childsnatchers" TAKING CHILDREN FROM PARENTS WHO HAVE NOT BEEN ACCUSED OR CONVICTED OF ANY CRIME WHATSOEVER ! Instead of "helpers" they are known as bullies who intimidate single mothers and whose main intent is meeting "adoption targets" not keeping families together . For ths image to change vital reforms are needed…….;
 
1:-Abolish the family court secrecy that gags parents who wish to complain.
2:-Abolish "emotional harm" and "risk" as justifications for putting children into care 
3:-Abolish "forced adoption"if a parent opposes an adoption in court
4:-Abolish decisions by family court judges to take babies and young children into care.(let juries decide) 
5:-Abolish the power of social services to regulate and control contact between parents and children , to censor their conversation or to restrict phone calls.The court must control the frequency of contacts.  
6:-Abolish the restriction preventing a lay advisor from presenting a case for parents refused legal aid
7:-Abolish hearsay evidence in family courts and require witnesses to stick to facts without "speculation."
8:-Abolish the removal of children for non life threatening forms of neglect such as absences from school or insanitary dwellings unless a written warning  has been served and the situation has not been remedied.
 
These reforms would stop most of the present injustices.

Care Brokerage: Remove requirement to become registered care provider in order to provide services matching personal carers to people wishing to purchase their own care using Individual Budgets

To see changes made so that businesses can provide a Care Brokerage role, to match adults to individual and often independent personal carers and personal assistants, without that business having to be registered as a care provider (Care Standards Act):

Why is this idea important?

To see changes made so that businesses can provide a Care Brokerage role, to match adults to individual and often independent personal carers and personal assistants, without that business having to be registered as a care provider (Care Standards Act):

Prohibition of drugs causes crime, de-criminalise them!

 

We are all aware that the fight against drug use and abuse over the last 50 years has failed spectacularly, no one can deny this.

We are also aware that the increasing use of drugs illegally has increased the levels of crime and violence to levels not seen in the last 100 years.

The number of public servants, social workers, police, NHS staff etc has risen to levels never required before, this is in response to the attempt to stop the  illegal use of drugs.

The number of people in prisons has exploded, around 84,000 currently.

It would be irresponsible to enact legislation, as proposed by Ken Clarke, to reduce short term prison sentences until the de-criminalisation of drugs is tackled.

Many prisoners are there for petty crime offences to pay for the illegal use of drugs. They will be forced to continue to support their habit / addiction illegally if they are not jailed  and so crime will continue to increase.

It is plainly a nonsense to prohibit drugs, as it would be plainly wrong to end prohibition without a proper structure to allow drug users to avail themselves of drugs legally. 

Now is the time for the Coalition Government to tackle this huge drug issue and put it at the front of our agenda for dealing with many of the problems in our society.

Why is this idea important?

 

We are all aware that the fight against drug use and abuse over the last 50 years has failed spectacularly, no one can deny this.

We are also aware that the increasing use of drugs illegally has increased the levels of crime and violence to levels not seen in the last 100 years.

The number of public servants, social workers, police, NHS staff etc has risen to levels never required before, this is in response to the attempt to stop the  illegal use of drugs.

The number of people in prisons has exploded, around 84,000 currently.

It would be irresponsible to enact legislation, as proposed by Ken Clarke, to reduce short term prison sentences until the de-criminalisation of drugs is tackled.

Many prisoners are there for petty crime offences to pay for the illegal use of drugs. They will be forced to continue to support their habit / addiction illegally if they are not jailed  and so crime will continue to increase.

It is plainly a nonsense to prohibit drugs, as it would be plainly wrong to end prohibition without a proper structure to allow drug users to avail themselves of drugs legally. 

Now is the time for the Coalition Government to tackle this huge drug issue and put it at the front of our agenda for dealing with many of the problems in our society.

Get rid of red tape surrounding adoption.

I am 1 of many people who would like to adopt in the near future, but currently i will have a major fight to do so given the amount of red tape, tests, exams, courses etc…. that is compulsary before YOU are told that your capable to adopt. I have a loving partner, we have our own children who are happy, loved, do well in most of their achievements and are behind us adopting. I have a friend that tried to adopt but was refused due to a criminal offence from 20 years ago! has never re-offended since and is a wonderful parent, who was willing to adopt 2 or more siblings.

Why is this idea important?

I am 1 of many people who would like to adopt in the near future, but currently i will have a major fight to do so given the amount of red tape, tests, exams, courses etc…. that is compulsary before YOU are told that your capable to adopt. I have a loving partner, we have our own children who are happy, loved, do well in most of their achievements and are behind us adopting. I have a friend that tried to adopt but was refused due to a criminal offence from 20 years ago! has never re-offended since and is a wonderful parent, who was willing to adopt 2 or more siblings.

Adoption, social services and the family courts

The 'quotas' for adoption given to Social Service Departments should be ended immediately, as should any departmental financial incentives.  Thus Social Services Departments can go  back to a proper function where 'forced adoptions' are the last resort, and not the first.

Secondly the Family Courts should be held in public.  If justice is to be done, then it must be seen to be done.  This will no doubt raise a howl from all the lawyers, social workers and so called 'experts involved, about protecting children.  The reality is that the present system avoids showing up the avarice of the lawyers, and the incompetence and arrogance of the 'experts' and social workers.

 

 

Why is this idea important?

The 'quotas' for adoption given to Social Service Departments should be ended immediately, as should any departmental financial incentives.  Thus Social Services Departments can go  back to a proper function where 'forced adoptions' are the last resort, and not the first.

Secondly the Family Courts should be held in public.  If justice is to be done, then it must be seen to be done.  This will no doubt raise a howl from all the lawyers, social workers and so called 'experts involved, about protecting children.  The reality is that the present system avoids showing up the avarice of the lawyers, and the incompetence and arrogance of the 'experts' and social workers.

 

 

Unessarcary laws prohibiting the progress of Childrens Social services

My idea is to scrap all the unessarcary paperwork for social workers, so they can spend more time with the young people entrusted to their care, The whole serivce need a reform, it needs to be much more efficent, also i think that young people accross the county that are in care should have a council which put forward their views on how the service shoul be run in a much more efficent way to help them, which i actualy plan to set up this year, this is so the fabric of the level of care will be much more effectivew in serving and looking after those children who are most in need in this country, and it is wrong just to sit back and to watch these children suffer and have there right continuouslty being swayed, and abused, (i myself am a 16 yr old child in care) and continuing to rin the service in this way is not jsut impeeding the progress of the level of care support, they get, but it is resticting their future whcih will make them more likely to depend on benefits or be homeless, or end up in prison, and this will imnpeed the gfrowth and integrity of this country, it will jsut ruin the fabric of society, and this country will ineditably fall unless we act now to change the policies in Social services and unessarcary laws prohibiting disiplin of the child, for without disaplin they are much more vounderable to join gangs and illegal activities. so we need to make sure this does not happen and to bring them up on such a way that they will have a good start up for their lives.

Why is this idea important?

My idea is to scrap all the unessarcary paperwork for social workers, so they can spend more time with the young people entrusted to their care, The whole serivce need a reform, it needs to be much more efficent, also i think that young people accross the county that are in care should have a council which put forward their views on how the service shoul be run in a much more efficent way to help them, which i actualy plan to set up this year, this is so the fabric of the level of care will be much more effectivew in serving and looking after those children who are most in need in this country, and it is wrong just to sit back and to watch these children suffer and have there right continuouslty being swayed, and abused, (i myself am a 16 yr old child in care) and continuing to rin the service in this way is not jsut impeeding the progress of the level of care support, they get, but it is resticting their future whcih will make them more likely to depend on benefits or be homeless, or end up in prison, and this will imnpeed the gfrowth and integrity of this country, it will jsut ruin the fabric of society, and this country will ineditably fall unless we act now to change the policies in Social services and unessarcary laws prohibiting disiplin of the child, for without disaplin they are much more vounderable to join gangs and illegal activities. so we need to make sure this does not happen and to bring them up on such a way that they will have a good start up for their lives.

social service waste

I know that the socila service waste money I good example of this is   they had own staff to control direct payments scheme Then they put it out of house but did not get rid o the staff who had done the job So it costs twice as much

Also they get more and more staff and see the clients less and less They are totally top heavy with admin staff

Why is this idea important?

I know that the socila service waste money I good example of this is   they had own staff to control direct payments scheme Then they put it out of house but did not get rid o the staff who had done the job So it costs twice as much

Also they get more and more staff and see the clients less and less They are totally top heavy with admin staff