Curb Local Authority spending

One of the most basic freedoms is the freedom to spend your own money on whateverr you, personally, want.  Many local authorities arrogate this right to themselves, by imposing higher council tax to pay for the schemes wanted by small pressure groups.  In my area the town council caved in to demands froma small number of people for a civic theatre/arts centre.  In a referendum they won by about 1%, so since then the council has spent over £1,000,000 of taxpayers' money building and subsidising the place.  It is time this kind of thing was brought to an end – local authorities should be restircted in how much money they can spend on activitites that they are not legally required to carry out.  I would opt for a return to the old measure, one old penny in every pound of rates was the maximum allowed for "nice to have" spending.  Repeal and/or amend the legislation that set local authorities free to spend whatever they want on whatever they like.  Perhaps replace it with a standard of 1p in every £1 of council tax raised – much more generous than the old measure – but allow higher spending if, and only if, it is approved by a 75% majority of those entitled to vote in council elections.  That would bring them roughly into line with the requirments for extraordinary spending by private copanies, which have to get shareholder approval for such things as takeovers.

Why is this idea important?

One of the most basic freedoms is the freedom to spend your own money on whateverr you, personally, want.  Many local authorities arrogate this right to themselves, by imposing higher council tax to pay for the schemes wanted by small pressure groups.  In my area the town council caved in to demands froma small number of people for a civic theatre/arts centre.  In a referendum they won by about 1%, so since then the council has spent over £1,000,000 of taxpayers' money building and subsidising the place.  It is time this kind of thing was brought to an end – local authorities should be restircted in how much money they can spend on activitites that they are not legally required to carry out.  I would opt for a return to the old measure, one old penny in every pound of rates was the maximum allowed for "nice to have" spending.  Repeal and/or amend the legislation that set local authorities free to spend whatever they want on whatever they like.  Perhaps replace it with a standard of 1p in every £1 of council tax raised – much more generous than the old measure – but allow higher spending if, and only if, it is approved by a 75% majority of those entitled to vote in council elections.  That would bring them roughly into line with the requirments for extraordinary spending by private copanies, which have to get shareholder approval for such things as takeovers.

Policing: Reducing Paperwork

I recently had cause to have to report a crime to the Met Police: the two officers who attended were the very image of professionalism but it was pointed out to me, after the box ticking and long-hand writing of a statement for me to sign, that this would need to be typed up when they returned to their station. 

It strikes me that where Ocado, Sainsbury and others can use PDAs, why can't the local constabulary? This would halve the amount of effort necessary and get more police back on the beat serving the public. 

Why is this idea important?

I recently had cause to have to report a crime to the Met Police: the two officers who attended were the very image of professionalism but it was pointed out to me, after the box ticking and long-hand writing of a statement for me to sign, that this would need to be typed up when they returned to their station. 

It strikes me that where Ocado, Sainsbury and others can use PDAs, why can't the local constabulary? This would halve the amount of effort necessary and get more police back on the beat serving the public. 

Build new prisons where employment is needed most

If new prisons are required to replace old uneconomic prisons it is common sense to build them in areas where employment is needed most. A 1500 place prison is said to provide over a thousand jobs, in a depressed area such as parts of Wales that would be a thousand people off of benefits and be a major boost to the regeneration of the area.

I note that the MOJ are currently pursuing a rural site in Runwell, Essex, a site earmarked in the LDF as a housing site. Runwell is in an area that does not need regeneration as it has reasonably high employment. To my certain knowledge i know that the leader of the overseeing council of Chelmsford has written personally to the Minister of Justice Mr. Blunt stating that fact, (And this despite the fact that the MOJ are offering a £20 million sweetener in return for outline planning permission)

In this time of belt tightening it does not make economic sense to force such a development on a green belt site where it is not wanted, when depressed areas would welcome the development with open arms and a £20 Million sweetener would not be required.

regards john wiles

Why is this idea important?

If new prisons are required to replace old uneconomic prisons it is common sense to build them in areas where employment is needed most. A 1500 place prison is said to provide over a thousand jobs, in a depressed area such as parts of Wales that would be a thousand people off of benefits and be a major boost to the regeneration of the area.

I note that the MOJ are currently pursuing a rural site in Runwell, Essex, a site earmarked in the LDF as a housing site. Runwell is in an area that does not need regeneration as it has reasonably high employment. To my certain knowledge i know that the leader of the overseeing council of Chelmsford has written personally to the Minister of Justice Mr. Blunt stating that fact, (And this despite the fact that the MOJ are offering a £20 million sweetener in return for outline planning permission)

In this time of belt tightening it does not make economic sense to force such a development on a green belt site where it is not wanted, when depressed areas would welcome the development with open arms and a £20 Million sweetener would not be required.

regards john wiles

savings in the Magistrates’ Court

Dear sir / madam, 

I am a junior barrister who has considerable experience of the Magistrates' Court.  I think you could save money in the following ways; 

– abolish committal hearings, just request a 6(1) committal if necessary. 

– Stricter criteria for police before they refuse bail.  The majority of overnight cases which custody sgnts refuse bail on get bail with conditions in the Magistrates' Court the next day.  

– All legal advisor's to be in court and available to deal with matters under delegated powers where appropriate, then the bench can be in at 10.00am on the dot. 

– All Magistrates' Courts to open at 9.00am and all prosecutors to be available to serve papers at 9.00am enabling cases to start promptly at 10.00am.  

 

Many thanks, 

Frances Ridout

Why is this idea important?

Dear sir / madam, 

I am a junior barrister who has considerable experience of the Magistrates' Court.  I think you could save money in the following ways; 

– abolish committal hearings, just request a 6(1) committal if necessary. 

– Stricter criteria for police before they refuse bail.  The majority of overnight cases which custody sgnts refuse bail on get bail with conditions in the Magistrates' Court the next day.  

– All legal advisor's to be in court and available to deal with matters under delegated powers where appropriate, then the bench can be in at 10.00am on the dot. 

– All Magistrates' Courts to open at 9.00am and all prosecutors to be available to serve papers at 9.00am enabling cases to start promptly at 10.00am.  

 

Many thanks, 

Frances Ridout

Communication between Gov’t departments

I would like to see more communication between government departments. Mainly housing and council benefit from councils being able to access working tax credits and other departments to check a claimants monetry situation if they are on any benefits etc. 

At the moment the councils can only get the information if they send out letters to people and usually send half a trees worth at a time and wait for a reply. This is a lengthy process fraught with pitfalls along the way.

My council tells me that at present they cannot do this despite the fact many people ask why they can't. I would gladly sign a form on my application to say I allow/give my permission for them to contact other govn't offices to check I am claiming the right amount. I have nothing to hide and I want to make the process easier where the room for error is minimalised.

I am fed up of waiting for the tax credits people to actually answer their phones so I can chase up where my award notice is that I need to send to the council so they can check my claim is up to date. Usually this process can take ages which then means overpayments and councils then try to claim this back which is a whole lot harder to do and is very frustrating to all.

Why is this idea important?

I would like to see more communication between government departments. Mainly housing and council benefit from councils being able to access working tax credits and other departments to check a claimants monetry situation if they are on any benefits etc. 

At the moment the councils can only get the information if they send out letters to people and usually send half a trees worth at a time and wait for a reply. This is a lengthy process fraught with pitfalls along the way.

My council tells me that at present they cannot do this despite the fact many people ask why they can't. I would gladly sign a form on my application to say I allow/give my permission for them to contact other govn't offices to check I am claiming the right amount. I have nothing to hide and I want to make the process easier where the room for error is minimalised.

I am fed up of waiting for the tax credits people to actually answer their phones so I can chase up where my award notice is that I need to send to the council so they can check my claim is up to date. Usually this process can take ages which then means overpayments and councils then try to claim this back which is a whole lot harder to do and is very frustrating to all.

Reduce the cost of Benefits and Benefit Fraud

The essential point of benefits is to give the needy the means to eat, keep a roof over their heads, and pay essential bills. Many hard working people are resentful of the amount that inevitably gets spent on smoking, drinking, Sky TV,  etcetera.

With technologies available today, it would not be difficult to issue claimants with a card similar to a Bank card. Money gets credited to the Card directly from the Government. With the co-operation of the supermarkets and utilities, it would not be difficult to ensure that only appropriate items can be bought using the card that would fulfil the role of the welfare state from an 'approved basket'.

If people want the ability to spend money on less essential products like the 12-pack of Special Brew or a full Sky package, then they will need to earn some money to get it. It would also be possible to encourage healthy eating and discourage foods that have contributed to the obesity issue.

 

Why is this idea important?

The essential point of benefits is to give the needy the means to eat, keep a roof over their heads, and pay essential bills. Many hard working people are resentful of the amount that inevitably gets spent on smoking, drinking, Sky TV,  etcetera.

With technologies available today, it would not be difficult to issue claimants with a card similar to a Bank card. Money gets credited to the Card directly from the Government. With the co-operation of the supermarkets and utilities, it would not be difficult to ensure that only appropriate items can be bought using the card that would fulfil the role of the welfare state from an 'approved basket'.

If people want the ability to spend money on less essential products like the 12-pack of Special Brew or a full Sky package, then they will need to earn some money to get it. It would also be possible to encourage healthy eating and discourage foods that have contributed to the obesity issue.

 

what child trust fund??

scrap the child trust fund scheme. millions of pounds go into trust funds for all our children, every day.  £2oo is a drop in the ocean to the many wealthy parents recieving this and they cannot just choose to not redeem the amount, it will just automatically go into a government chosen account. it hasnt been much help to the less fortunate of us, so far, either. i would love to know that there is a little nest-egg slowly growing into something substantial for my son (unfortunately my daughter missed out) but, every year when i get his annual statement there is less and less there. by the time he is old enough to cash in, there will be nothing left. i have not been able to add to it so far, but if i had, i dont think i would, after seeing the negative interest. anyway, shouldnt i be the one to decide how to save for my childrens future? stop this mad, fruitless giveaway and put the money saved to better use!

Why is this idea important?

scrap the child trust fund scheme. millions of pounds go into trust funds for all our children, every day.  £2oo is a drop in the ocean to the many wealthy parents recieving this and they cannot just choose to not redeem the amount, it will just automatically go into a government chosen account. it hasnt been much help to the less fortunate of us, so far, either. i would love to know that there is a little nest-egg slowly growing into something substantial for my son (unfortunately my daughter missed out) but, every year when i get his annual statement there is less and less there. by the time he is old enough to cash in, there will be nothing left. i have not been able to add to it so far, but if i had, i dont think i would, after seeing the negative interest. anyway, shouldnt i be the one to decide how to save for my childrens future? stop this mad, fruitless giveaway and put the money saved to better use!

Freedom of information act

I would like to see an end to this act it serves no purpose and has put an additional cost on the public purse dealing with all the inquiries that the press submit every day. Like how many road kills has been collected by councils and distroyed or how many street lights were repaired. This means that time and money are wasted each and every by councils doing searches which really no normal member of the public cares about.

Why is this idea important?

I would like to see an end to this act it serves no purpose and has put an additional cost on the public purse dealing with all the inquiries that the press submit every day. Like how many road kills has been collected by councils and distroyed or how many street lights were repaired. This means that time and money are wasted each and every by councils doing searches which really no normal member of the public cares about.

International usergroups for military hardware

Five of NATO member states are part of the so called EPAF: European Participating Air Forces. This group consists of five Air Forces, who joined forces on the operational logistics of their F-16A/B's and embarked upon a combined (together with the USAF) modernisation of the F-16 (the Midlife Update programme).

Great Britain has to cut heavily on defence spending. Yet, each and every time the RAF, the Naval Air Arm and the Army Air Corps seem to want something different than the countries surrounding the UK. The WAH-64 Apache AH1 differs so much from the Apaches of the US Army and the RNLAF (other Apache users), that no logistic economies of scale can be realized. The same is more or less true for the Tornado Force, Joint Force Harrier and the Typhoon.

Why not agree on an international standard and try to form international usergroups for miliatry equipment and weapons? If small countries can achieve considerable economies of scale, so should Britain! Why let the Brirtish armed forces go to waste because of the interests of industry?

Why is this idea important?

Five of NATO member states are part of the so called EPAF: European Participating Air Forces. This group consists of five Air Forces, who joined forces on the operational logistics of their F-16A/B's and embarked upon a combined (together with the USAF) modernisation of the F-16 (the Midlife Update programme).

Great Britain has to cut heavily on defence spending. Yet, each and every time the RAF, the Naval Air Arm and the Army Air Corps seem to want something different than the countries surrounding the UK. The WAH-64 Apache AH1 differs so much from the Apaches of the US Army and the RNLAF (other Apache users), that no logistic economies of scale can be realized. The same is more or less true for the Tornado Force, Joint Force Harrier and the Typhoon.

Why not agree on an international standard and try to form international usergroups for miliatry equipment and weapons? If small countries can achieve considerable economies of scale, so should Britain! Why let the Brirtish armed forces go to waste because of the interests of industry?

public sector salary cut of 10% £15k – £19.9k, 20% cut up to £30k, 25% above

As the private sector has taken average 20% pay cut over last year and very little contribution to pension payments the public sector should also 'take a hit' in pay and benefits. That is the pensions, which are much better. Listen to any police, teacher or goverment worker that retired in the last 10 years or so that 'THEY NEVER HAD IT SO GOOD'. More money than they know what to do with, also being able to retire MUCH earlier than the 'general' private sector workers.

Why do police and the NHS employees 'sell' their services back to the public services after retireing at 50 or 55. Or in the NHS resigning and going 'private' or into agencies at very much inflated rates which then cost the police and NHS loads of money.

 They also get a INFLATION linked pension, what's that…..

Why is this idea important?

As the private sector has taken average 20% pay cut over last year and very little contribution to pension payments the public sector should also 'take a hit' in pay and benefits. That is the pensions, which are much better. Listen to any police, teacher or goverment worker that retired in the last 10 years or so that 'THEY NEVER HAD IT SO GOOD'. More money than they know what to do with, also being able to retire MUCH earlier than the 'general' private sector workers.

Why do police and the NHS employees 'sell' their services back to the public services after retireing at 50 or 55. Or in the NHS resigning and going 'private' or into agencies at very much inflated rates which then cost the police and NHS loads of money.

 They also get a INFLATION linked pension, what's that…..

Solve some of the problems

Scrap (temporarily) immigration until work is available for all U.K. born (& 2nd generation)

Provide work for all 16 year old and above and scrap ALL benefits, saving enormous amounts in Admin. costs EXCEPT for Military injured on active service, who should automatically be given Blue Badges (Disabled Drivers) or free travel, ALL Hospital Treatment and Medication also free.

Jobs to be createdwhere neccessary for disabled (e.g. Toilet Attendants, Car Park Attendants, Lift Men/Women, Cal Centre Operators etc etc

ALL transport to be electric wherever possible to cut cost of Oil imports

All Defence spending to be in U.K. ONLY: thus no dependance on parts from another country, jobs for u.k. citizens no outflow of cash to pay for Americal, Canadian etc products

ALL operations owned by overseas interests (e.g. Anglian Water: France: Electricite de France, France Telecom, Santander, Telefonica, Deutsche Telecom etc) so that we are not held to ransom by external influences.

Encourage ALL  development of electrically powered items to replace any item using imported fuel. (Think WW2 convoys – if it had to be brought in by convoy substitute a home grown item) and havingdeveloped the electrical power unit EXPORT, EXPORT, EXPORT

Finally ensure NO building work granted permission unless green and ecologically sound

AND ALL rules/laws RIGIDLY enforced by Policing policies under close Governmental scrutiny

Why is this idea important?

Scrap (temporarily) immigration until work is available for all U.K. born (& 2nd generation)

Provide work for all 16 year old and above and scrap ALL benefits, saving enormous amounts in Admin. costs EXCEPT for Military injured on active service, who should automatically be given Blue Badges (Disabled Drivers) or free travel, ALL Hospital Treatment and Medication also free.

Jobs to be createdwhere neccessary for disabled (e.g. Toilet Attendants, Car Park Attendants, Lift Men/Women, Cal Centre Operators etc etc

ALL transport to be electric wherever possible to cut cost of Oil imports

All Defence spending to be in U.K. ONLY: thus no dependance on parts from another country, jobs for u.k. citizens no outflow of cash to pay for Americal, Canadian etc products

ALL operations owned by overseas interests (e.g. Anglian Water: France: Electricite de France, France Telecom, Santander, Telefonica, Deutsche Telecom etc) so that we are not held to ransom by external influences.

Encourage ALL  development of electrically powered items to replace any item using imported fuel. (Think WW2 convoys – if it had to be brought in by convoy substitute a home grown item) and havingdeveloped the electrical power unit EXPORT, EXPORT, EXPORT

Finally ensure NO building work granted permission unless green and ecologically sound

AND ALL rules/laws RIGIDLY enforced by Policing policies under close Governmental scrutiny

Car mobility allowance should be means tested

Car mobility allowance should be means tested.  Example, a person with a good pension living in property worth around a million pounds whose partner has never driven has a good pension but has mobility issues should not automatically qualify for a mobility car.

Why is this idea important?

Car mobility allowance should be means tested.  Example, a person with a good pension living in property worth around a million pounds whose partner has never driven has a good pension but has mobility issues should not automatically qualify for a mobility car.

Privatised Met Office – Bring It on…..

Go ahead and privatise the Met Office: it might stop them banging on about 'Climate change' as if it's a foregone conclusion.

Hang on – I'll just have a look…

Wait…. they already have! It's 'Climate Science' Now.. All very different from just a few months ago. It was all cut and dried then; anyone who disagreed was likened to a member of the Flat Earth Society. Now, they're using phrases like :

"Because we can’t know the future for certain, our climate change scientists use computer-based climate models to project plausible scenarios, or projections, for coming centuries. It is important to be aware that projections from climate models are always subject to uncertainty because of limitations on our knowledge of how the climate system works and on the computing resources available. Different climate models can give different projections…."

"Despite the uncertainties, all models show that the Earth will warm in the next century"…

NEXT CENTURY…. pretty safe bet that – it could be ANY time in the next century. It could be by ANY amount.

Uncertanties – What uncertainties? When New Labour was in power, global warming, caused by CO2 emissions, was presented as FACT! (And of course, provided bags and bags of possibilties for 'Green Taxes' – for those green enough to swallow it.)

So – what's changed, in 6 months? The climate? Not really – typical British Summer.

Or could it be the change of government, a chance that their funding may be in danger, and having to face the possibility of life in the real world? 

But wait… What's this? 'Global Dimming?'

Caused by…. pulling the wool over our eyes?  No – aerosols actually. Haven't we been here before?

Why is this idea important?

Go ahead and privatise the Met Office: it might stop them banging on about 'Climate change' as if it's a foregone conclusion.

Hang on – I'll just have a look…

Wait…. they already have! It's 'Climate Science' Now.. All very different from just a few months ago. It was all cut and dried then; anyone who disagreed was likened to a member of the Flat Earth Society. Now, they're using phrases like :

"Because we can’t know the future for certain, our climate change scientists use computer-based climate models to project plausible scenarios, or projections, for coming centuries. It is important to be aware that projections from climate models are always subject to uncertainty because of limitations on our knowledge of how the climate system works and on the computing resources available. Different climate models can give different projections…."

"Despite the uncertainties, all models show that the Earth will warm in the next century"…

NEXT CENTURY…. pretty safe bet that – it could be ANY time in the next century. It could be by ANY amount.

Uncertanties – What uncertainties? When New Labour was in power, global warming, caused by CO2 emissions, was presented as FACT! (And of course, provided bags and bags of possibilties for 'Green Taxes' – for those green enough to swallow it.)

So – what's changed, in 6 months? The climate? Not really – typical British Summer.

Or could it be the change of government, a chance that their funding may be in danger, and having to face the possibility of life in the real world? 

But wait… What's this? 'Global Dimming?'

Caused by…. pulling the wool over our eyes?  No – aerosols actually. Haven't we been here before?

the government should pay for the funerals

and help support the families of all the genuinely disabled people in this country that will and in some cases already have killed themselves over decisions made in their Work Capability Assessments and DLA Medicals and the worry the prospect of losing their DLA is already causing them, like the man in scotland who was found dead next to two letters informing him that he was having all his benefits removed.

its the least Gideon could do

Why is this idea important?

and help support the families of all the genuinely disabled people in this country that will and in some cases already have killed themselves over decisions made in their Work Capability Assessments and DLA Medicals and the worry the prospect of losing their DLA is already causing them, like the man in scotland who was found dead next to two letters informing him that he was having all his benefits removed.

its the least Gideon could do

No future ideological cuts by the conservatives

Abolish the future ideological cuts that the conservatives want to make.

We are not in this together. The conservatives have money; lots of other people who rely on government services do not.

Having charities and volunteers provide government  services is a terrible idea. I don't want to volunteer to do things government should be doing.

Forcing GPs to make many decisions about what services to offer is a dreadful idea. Great way to privatise the NHS, David!

Privatising the Met Office – dreadful!

The people of this country appear to be willing to sit back and let the conservatives dismantle their society. The conservatives stand for nothing, except keeping money in their pockets. WAKE UP AND FIGHT BACK!

Why is this idea important?

Abolish the future ideological cuts that the conservatives want to make.

We are not in this together. The conservatives have money; lots of other people who rely on government services do not.

Having charities and volunteers provide government  services is a terrible idea. I don't want to volunteer to do things government should be doing.

Forcing GPs to make many decisions about what services to offer is a dreadful idea. Great way to privatise the NHS, David!

Privatising the Met Office – dreadful!

The people of this country appear to be willing to sit back and let the conservatives dismantle their society. The conservatives stand for nothing, except keeping money in their pockets. WAKE UP AND FIGHT BACK!

The NHS – some savings

The idea is in three parts:

*   to reduce the number of clerical and management staff so as to provide, once again, more beds than administration people

*   to encourage people, by way of a tax break, to take up private health insurance and thus be able to pay for treatment outside ot the NHS with the concomitant huge cost savings

*   review the so-called Private Public Initiativewhereby the NHS leases back premises – an ongoing and very expensive exercise – and renegotiate the terms 

Why is this idea important?

The idea is in three parts:

*   to reduce the number of clerical and management staff so as to provide, once again, more beds than administration people

*   to encourage people, by way of a tax break, to take up private health insurance and thus be able to pay for treatment outside ot the NHS with the concomitant huge cost savings

*   review the so-called Private Public Initiativewhereby the NHS leases back premises – an ongoing and very expensive exercise – and renegotiate the terms 

Freedom of movement

Get rid of all the guard railing and the regs. and narrow safty audit contexts that result in significant restiction of the basic right that is the freedom of movement. Reintroduce common sense, follow best practise and safe millions if not billions of pounds between now and the next election. Imagine Places without guard railings!

Why is this idea important?

Get rid of all the guard railing and the regs. and narrow safty audit contexts that result in significant restiction of the basic right that is the freedom of movement. Reintroduce common sense, follow best practise and safe millions if not billions of pounds between now and the next election. Imagine Places without guard railings!

Unemployment reform

SEE PEOPLE AS AN ASSET NOT A LIABILITY

We will not be able to rationalize and reform this benefit until we stop thinking about people as being unemployed and start thinking about them being in part time employment of the government. If we make this change we now have millions of man hours which we can organize into small 'companies' employing say no more than 100 people.

The employees of these companies would have the same rights and responsibilities as other workers and be paid a wage based on the minimum wage for say 14 hrs per week over two days, they would have to turn up on time and sign in and out as other workers do. Let them start work at 9.30 and finish early to avoid peak time travel and absence would not be paid. The normal rules for sickness absence would apply.

It would be the managers job to find them work, anything from cutting grass to brushing the streets or use their brain and use them as a cheap employment source for local companies and councils, charge only £3.50 an hour.( this would reduce the cost to the government)  However there must be a clause that says a council can't hire an employee from the companies if they have made a similar person redundant or put them on short time within a set period.

Where a manager has no work for a group of employees for a period he should use them for community work. These companies could also be used to serve community service orders handed out by the courts.

The managers would also come from the ranks of the unemployed with some additional help from regional managers.

Each company within an area could have a number of trades i.e., painters, wages clerks or joiners and when a person has their first interview they should be given a list of companies they can apply to join which would reflect their skill and location.

Start the scheme as a small pilot on a voluntary basis and if good value for money roll the voluntary scheme out nationally and then make it mandatory.

Companies hiring the personnel could ask for a particular person and would be encouraged to eventually offer them a full time job.

It would also help small business to grow as the economy picks up

If one of these companies needs a multi skilled employee it should be able to have him trained by the nearest sister company that is based on training

There should be no limit to the type of employment these companies can offer but there must be safegaurds to protect local industry and prevent companies as seeing this a cheap alternative to hiring their own workers.

Why is this idea important?

SEE PEOPLE AS AN ASSET NOT A LIABILITY

We will not be able to rationalize and reform this benefit until we stop thinking about people as being unemployed and start thinking about them being in part time employment of the government. If we make this change we now have millions of man hours which we can organize into small 'companies' employing say no more than 100 people.

The employees of these companies would have the same rights and responsibilities as other workers and be paid a wage based on the minimum wage for say 14 hrs per week over two days, they would have to turn up on time and sign in and out as other workers do. Let them start work at 9.30 and finish early to avoid peak time travel and absence would not be paid. The normal rules for sickness absence would apply.

It would be the managers job to find them work, anything from cutting grass to brushing the streets or use their brain and use them as a cheap employment source for local companies and councils, charge only £3.50 an hour.( this would reduce the cost to the government)  However there must be a clause that says a council can't hire an employee from the companies if they have made a similar person redundant or put them on short time within a set period.

Where a manager has no work for a group of employees for a period he should use them for community work. These companies could also be used to serve community service orders handed out by the courts.

The managers would also come from the ranks of the unemployed with some additional help from regional managers.

Each company within an area could have a number of trades i.e., painters, wages clerks or joiners and when a person has their first interview they should be given a list of companies they can apply to join which would reflect their skill and location.

Start the scheme as a small pilot on a voluntary basis and if good value for money roll the voluntary scheme out nationally and then make it mandatory.

Companies hiring the personnel could ask for a particular person and would be encouraged to eventually offer them a full time job.

It would also help small business to grow as the economy picks up

If one of these companies needs a multi skilled employee it should be able to have him trained by the nearest sister company that is based on training

There should be no limit to the type of employment these companies can offer but there must be safegaurds to protect local industry and prevent companies as seeing this a cheap alternative to hiring their own workers.

CUTS

WHEN MAJOR CUTS ARE COMING FOR ALL GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS – INCLUDING EVEN OUR OWN DEFENCE OF THESE ISLANDS I WOULD LOVE TO READ OF THE CUTS COMING TO THE OLYMPICS – THAT HUGE WASTE OF MONEY. AM I NOT READING THE RIGHT PAPERS?

 

MIKE C

Why is this idea important?

WHEN MAJOR CUTS ARE COMING FOR ALL GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS – INCLUDING EVEN OUR OWN DEFENCE OF THESE ISLANDS I WOULD LOVE TO READ OF THE CUTS COMING TO THE OLYMPICS – THAT HUGE WASTE OF MONEY. AM I NOT READING THE RIGHT PAPERS?

 

MIKE C

Stop announcements rather put forward ideas to the bodies concerned

My idea is straightforward and simple.  I am disabled, I am Fifty years old and I have been fortunate to have received a good education, continue through University, and work before and after a post graduate year.  Unfortunately, due to poor health, pain and frequent fatigue, I have been medically severanced, I pay tax and council tax.  I also am forced to top up the difference to my pension with Incapacity Benefit and I am in receipt of Disability Living Allowance.

The point I wish to make is, please look at every person as an individual.  I am depressed as well as living with a chronic condition, and a debilitating spinal injury which is treated by opiate medication.  I would love to have my health back and to work again, however, this is something I have been advised against doing.  I have tried going back to work by attempting to hold down a voluntary job in an area I thoroughly enjoyed.

With respect, I am finding Mr. Cleggs attitude about working being the best thing for people who are claiming benefit and that once in the system it is difficult to get out.  Please, I beg, do not tar everyone with the same brush.  There must be countless people like myself.  I am on Incapacity Benefit and DLA, I am worried beyond words, I am not sleeping and making myself ill.  I am being referred to the local mental health team because of all this.  Last year I was called in by Atos for a return to work medical, my GP intervened, It is not practical.  Donna from Atos informed me that I could have two years to get over it.  This shocked me beyond belief.  If I could I would cease claiming incapacity benefit, in fact any goverment benefit which over the years I have paid into through National Insurance Contributions and Tax.

I have been badly affected by Mr. George Osborne's DLA medical proposals, It was only whilst I was receiving Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy, that my mobility component was increased and this was for a fixed time, last year, It was as if a weight had been lifted off my shoulders when I was awarded DLA for an indefinite period.

Like many other people I am feeling extremely anxious, vulnerable and have no where to turn.  I am someone with a Degree and a vote.  I have worked for a major company, I have held a position of responsibility and taught.  I am considering returning to teach and all for reasons which i am being forced into.  I am extremely worried about my future.  My white blood cell count is lowering, due to stress, lack of sleep and bujeting on a spreadsheet isn't helping.  Without my DLA I lose my mobility, no car, i will be even worse than now about attending my hospital appoinments. 

Please, this is my suggestion, that rather than suddenly announcing to the public about such cuts, you did it again last week to the middle classes about Winter Payments.  I am I have to say a bit ignorant there as I am not  a person who claims them, I am  not on Income Support but Incapacity Benefit, I pay my own prescriptions and my life is sorting out a dosette box, starving myself regularly for ultra shound x rays.  You see, i have two three major conditions, two chroninc and potentially fatal, the other one is degenerative, it will get worse.  At the moment I see very little point in existing any more, I am close to tears, I believe that I am not the only one, I have read similar stories.  If someone, irrespective of having worked before or not is on Incapacity and DLA then there has to be a reason.  It took much investigation, medicals, specialists and doctors being consulted before I was awarded the higher rate mobility and middle rate care;  I am fotunately able to now afford the help of a lady who has a key and if I was in so much pain would stay in my spare room..  I am indepedant and like to do what I can, however pain kicks in all too quickly and I am relying on my help.  I am fortunate to have my car, I do not drive it when I am having a painful episode as I take break through medication on top of that which is prescribed, I also take medication for my other two conditions. 

I apologise if this is appearing to be about myself.  What it is, is an individual account.  I am one of many, many people all with stories to tell about my fears, concerns, how I would adddress a problem like you the Goverment are faced with.  I was no fan of the last Pm, however there is a man who pushed his health into the ground.  I just feel that WE ( THE PEOPLE AFFECTED BY YOUR NEW POLICIES) do not stand a chance to put forward to you how we feel, I know I am not alone in this.  I do not have much strength left in me here, but something has to be done and I am appealing to you to go about all of this in a different way.  Please go about this differently, consult disability organisations, it is easier that you think to find the scroungers on the system, most of them are sitting at home claiming Income support or ESA and Drinking to excess.

Why is this idea important?

My idea is straightforward and simple.  I am disabled, I am Fifty years old and I have been fortunate to have received a good education, continue through University, and work before and after a post graduate year.  Unfortunately, due to poor health, pain and frequent fatigue, I have been medically severanced, I pay tax and council tax.  I also am forced to top up the difference to my pension with Incapacity Benefit and I am in receipt of Disability Living Allowance.

The point I wish to make is, please look at every person as an individual.  I am depressed as well as living with a chronic condition, and a debilitating spinal injury which is treated by opiate medication.  I would love to have my health back and to work again, however, this is something I have been advised against doing.  I have tried going back to work by attempting to hold down a voluntary job in an area I thoroughly enjoyed.

With respect, I am finding Mr. Cleggs attitude about working being the best thing for people who are claiming benefit and that once in the system it is difficult to get out.  Please, I beg, do not tar everyone with the same brush.  There must be countless people like myself.  I am on Incapacity Benefit and DLA, I am worried beyond words, I am not sleeping and making myself ill.  I am being referred to the local mental health team because of all this.  Last year I was called in by Atos for a return to work medical, my GP intervened, It is not practical.  Donna from Atos informed me that I could have two years to get over it.  This shocked me beyond belief.  If I could I would cease claiming incapacity benefit, in fact any goverment benefit which over the years I have paid into through National Insurance Contributions and Tax.

I have been badly affected by Mr. George Osborne's DLA medical proposals, It was only whilst I was receiving Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy, that my mobility component was increased and this was for a fixed time, last year, It was as if a weight had been lifted off my shoulders when I was awarded DLA for an indefinite period.

Like many other people I am feeling extremely anxious, vulnerable and have no where to turn.  I am someone with a Degree and a vote.  I have worked for a major company, I have held a position of responsibility and taught.  I am considering returning to teach and all for reasons which i am being forced into.  I am extremely worried about my future.  My white blood cell count is lowering, due to stress, lack of sleep and bujeting on a spreadsheet isn't helping.  Without my DLA I lose my mobility, no car, i will be even worse than now about attending my hospital appoinments. 

Please, this is my suggestion, that rather than suddenly announcing to the public about such cuts, you did it again last week to the middle classes about Winter Payments.  I am I have to say a bit ignorant there as I am not  a person who claims them, I am  not on Income Support but Incapacity Benefit, I pay my own prescriptions and my life is sorting out a dosette box, starving myself regularly for ultra shound x rays.  You see, i have two three major conditions, two chroninc and potentially fatal, the other one is degenerative, it will get worse.  At the moment I see very little point in existing any more, I am close to tears, I believe that I am not the only one, I have read similar stories.  If someone, irrespective of having worked before or not is on Incapacity and DLA then there has to be a reason.  It took much investigation, medicals, specialists and doctors being consulted before I was awarded the higher rate mobility and middle rate care;  I am fotunately able to now afford the help of a lady who has a key and if I was in so much pain would stay in my spare room..  I am indepedant and like to do what I can, however pain kicks in all too quickly and I am relying on my help.  I am fortunate to have my car, I do not drive it when I am having a painful episode as I take break through medication on top of that which is prescribed, I also take medication for my other two conditions. 

I apologise if this is appearing to be about myself.  What it is, is an individual account.  I am one of many, many people all with stories to tell about my fears, concerns, how I would adddress a problem like you the Goverment are faced with.  I was no fan of the last Pm, however there is a man who pushed his health into the ground.  I just feel that WE ( THE PEOPLE AFFECTED BY YOUR NEW POLICIES) do not stand a chance to put forward to you how we feel, I know I am not alone in this.  I do not have much strength left in me here, but something has to be done and I am appealing to you to go about all of this in a different way.  Please go about this differently, consult disability organisations, it is easier that you think to find the scroungers on the system, most of them are sitting at home claiming Income support or ESA and Drinking to excess.

homes government to save money 300,000,000

 

saving money

I think this is something that the government has got to look at, why you ask it is costing the tax payer hundred of million of pounds all over the uk.

You have rented properties, council

You have rented properties, private rented

You have part rent part buy

You have properties to buy

build cost £36,000 year 1985

Councils properties you pay rent over 5,10,15,20 years that’s it, cost to build £36,000 after 10 years property worth £83,000

Private rented you pay the rent over 5,10,16,20 years that’s it, costs to build £36,000 after 10 years property is worth £83,000.

Part rent part buy you pay rent up to about 10 years and buy, you buy the lease or freehold, it cost to build £36,000 sold for £47,000, property in worth £83,000 but these are being sold at a loss we the tax payer are giving home’s away for free or part of them

These properties should be sold at the market value

Buy your property you pay £36,000 after 10 years property worth £83,000

I do not see any difference between rented properties, rent part buy property, and buy a property after

10 years all have the same market value, if same area, same type of construction

Why is this idea important?

 

saving money

I think this is something that the government has got to look at, why you ask it is costing the tax payer hundred of million of pounds all over the uk.

You have rented properties, council

You have rented properties, private rented

You have part rent part buy

You have properties to buy

build cost £36,000 year 1985

Councils properties you pay rent over 5,10,15,20 years that’s it, cost to build £36,000 after 10 years property worth £83,000

Private rented you pay the rent over 5,10,16,20 years that’s it, costs to build £36,000 after 10 years property is worth £83,000.

Part rent part buy you pay rent up to about 10 years and buy, you buy the lease or freehold, it cost to build £36,000 sold for £47,000, property in worth £83,000 but these are being sold at a loss we the tax payer are giving home’s away for free or part of them

These properties should be sold at the market value

Buy your property you pay £36,000 after 10 years property worth £83,000

I do not see any difference between rented properties, rent part buy property, and buy a property after

10 years all have the same market value, if same area, same type of construction

Road Fund Licence

I get a "Reduced Insurance Cost" due to a "Low Mileage per year" so "Scrap the Road Fund Licence" and "Put it on the Fuel Price" so it becomes like the Insurance: "Pay only for the mileage covered and the amount of fuel used". The tax evaders will have to pay when they buy petrol and the goverment will be sure of getting the revenue fair

Why is this idea important?

I get a "Reduced Insurance Cost" due to a "Low Mileage per year" so "Scrap the Road Fund Licence" and "Put it on the Fuel Price" so it becomes like the Insurance: "Pay only for the mileage covered and the amount of fuel used". The tax evaders will have to pay when they buy petrol and the goverment will be sure of getting the revenue fair

No more agency name changes

Rebranding is expensive and usually unecessary. Agencies like Marriage Guidance rebrand (Relate) and spend money to do it but don't make it obvious what they are for. Save public money by keeping the names the same.

Why is this idea important?

Rebranding is expensive and usually unecessary. Agencies like Marriage Guidance rebrand (Relate) and spend money to do it but don't make it obvious what they are for. Save public money by keeping the names the same.